Probably. A multi-national company always has openings. My group hire's a lot of recent grads so we usually make positions available 2-3 months before graduation dates.

Well it's very simple to break the EPA cycle down into a force equation. Elio already has a design target for the CdA, weight and rolling resistance so the opposing force can be easily calculated. Then all they need are transmission, final drive and tire sizes to relate ground speed to engine speed.

How'd you learn to cook, iron or wash clothes? You might have had some help learning the basics but it's all about practice and learning. No two jobs are the same.

Mazda should be doing quite well right now with the exchange rate. In just a few months it went from about ¥95 /dollar to today's ¥118/dollar.

Okay, I do agree there is no reason for the EPA to classify cars at all. And classifying a car based on it's interior volume is pretty dumb as the article illustrates. Still the car class has nothing to do with the CAFE standard.

The thing is, this article is misleading. The vehicle class size is not used for the Corporate Average Fuel Economy figure. The vehicle footprint is, so nothing is changed and this only points out that the government tool for car shopping is really really odd.

2002 Pt Cruiser is rated at 26MPG combined. 2002 Dodge Ram 1500 V8 4x4 is rated at 13 mpg combined. I'd wager the Pt Cruiser did bring up the CAFE a bit.

I already owned Ford stock, when it dipped below $14 after earnings reports, I grabbed up a bunch more. Ford has always payed decent dividends, and I have good faith in the blue oval to keep churning out products. Plus from a consumers stand point, Ford is doing a lot more technological development than say GM or…

I check the 2 series has a 13.7 gallon tank. Plus we all know those needles always go past the 100% mark.

The Swede's need to let the American's do the hot-rodding.

At least with Volvo's Current I-shit (not the model shown in the video) the shifts are as quick or quicker than a standard manual, and it allows for skipping gears.

The Prius is a fine car.

My coworker has one (working in Japan). And I'll tell you the one reason you don't want one. If you are over 5' 10" you simply wont fit. Not even in the front seat (yes there are back seats too). I have to sit sorta sideways in this thing so that my knees just barely fit with the car door closed. I have no idea how…

Most likely it will demonstrate how quickly the I-shift can shift. There's a new twin clutch application that should be even faster than the previous generation I-shift.

Hey me too!

I really like this articles because I happen to drive 25,000 a year. However I wouldn't feel safe in 80% of these cars. The Insight and the Prius I'd feel safe, and the Jetta is a maybe.

I love the Corvette, but almost nothing else from Chevrolet...
I love the 3 series, but the X4 really?

I love Mazda. Reliable, fun to drive cars. MX-5 to MP5 the cars are great.

Are you talking about the pictured car or 240's in general? The production 240's made 114 horsepower (N/A)

Been there, done that. My next clearing attempt caught the linesman right in the hip....

He's wearing full padding and the defense isn't even wearing shoulder pads. This must be a non checking game......that he's wearing shoulder pads in....