Swing and a miss. They tend not to look favorably upon gay people such as myself. But that was a nice attempt to deflect valid criticism by dismissing a person’s viewpoint because of an (incorrect) assumption. Really doing a lot to disprove the notion that you are a self-entitled prick who isn’t as intelligent as he…

I listened for about three minutes (which is about the threshold for my ears being able to take in his voice without being given an immense urge to self-immolate) on my drive into work today, right in the middle of his “let’s arm teachers” rant. I never thought I would agree with North Korea about anything, but…

I’m atheistic, but it’s people like you who feel the need to constantly tout your smugness and feelings of superiority over those who you deem to be below you intellectually who give atheists such an overall negative connotation with people. You felt so strongly of your self-importance that you thought it would be a…

Referring to yourself as “faggy” as a form of term reclamation = not for everyone, but still okay.

I recognize your viewpoint and your feelings as valid, as only a senseless cockweasle invalidates the feelings of others. And I feel like the message in your final sentence resonates on a broad level, in that people can be different and have different experiences, and yet they are still worthy of equal respect as…

I dunno. Could always run for President

Was this supposed to somehow be surprising? Like, at all? Because I’d consider this par for the course. If it were possible to quantify morals, you’d be lucky to get a single whole number if you combined every drop available in the entire administration.

The ultimate goal would be to incriminate Rosenstein and get him taken out of the picture. This would be huge, because Mueller isn’t likely to do any actual indicting of Trump himself, as that would fly in the face of common DOJ policy. Instead, he’d turn his findings over to Rosenstein, who would then have the…

You took the words right out of my mouth. Clicked the article specifically to comment on how he looks like he just radiates disdain for brown people from his very pores. It’s uncanny how stereotypical he looks.

My brain smashed that together and read it as “rehydrated,” which I immediately accepted because that seemed appropriate for wrinkly prunes well past their expiration dates.

I am in the legal business and have had dealings with the man directly. Could not have happened to a nicer fellow. It’s a shame about the art, though.

He’s on a LOT of drugs. I say that from second-hand anecdotes (one of my best friends was at a party he was attending, and he was high out of his mind and acted exactly as you would expect of a Hollywood legacy child—an entitled asshole).

I’m just frustrated that all of these articles are focused on these plot elements as if that’s all that goes into making a movie good or bad. It’s not. Having an enjoyable movie and having a good movie are two completely different things. There can be great movies that are unenjoyable, terrible movies that are…

I thought Leia’s space flight was just...completely unnecessary. The effects made the whole thing cheesy. There were much better ways of getting her unconscious for a few scenes to push some of the plot’s conflict forward, like having Ackbar heroically shoving her into an airlock/pod after being alerted to incoming…

They laid off Dan O’Brien. What the actual fuck.

Then I’ll re-phrase: it’s (relatively) commonplace (in the fields I’ve personally worked in). I can’t speak to the norms of other industries. To elaborate on what that looks like, my current boss, a lawyer, has a policy of keeping his door open most of the day, but whenever he’s on a sensitive call or when a client…

On that, I completely agree. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that his purpose in requesting it was nefarious. The only justification I can think of would be if he held interviews in his office, but he wasn’t even the kind of journalist (and I use that term loosely) who would warrant it. I 100% believe that in this…

That’s what I thought. I guess it’s just hard to put myself in the shoes of someone who wouldn’t have knowledge of such setups, as that’s been a thing for so long that I assumed it was general (and practical) knowledge.

So apparently this is an experiential issue, as I wouldn’t blink twice at that kind of detail and I am baffled that anyone would react so negatively. Because that’s not “Bond-villain shit” to me. It’s “reasonable and normal for corporate-level offices shit.” I get what you’re saying and your reasons why, so please…