w220
DerW220
w220

That grill is only “not good” on the ones that didn’t have it to begin with and those they transplanted it on. The original designs work great.

Seriously??? “SX”?? Have you ever heard of the legendary Lexus SC?

The new GS was already bad in my opinion. If you’ve actually seen the redo of this GS, you will realize it looks great. It doesn’t in pictures. Again, LOOK at one in the flesh and you will appreciate it.

They are getting much better as time passes. It’s rather ignorant to say that. Would you rather them TRY to design cars or push out the same crap they did for 20 years? The new SC500 will blow all of our minds with beauty.

BMW is by FAR the worst. If you already think it’s bad, just wait until the G30 5-Series is shown next to the new 7-Series.

The “...facelifted GS-F train wreck...”? Are you SERIOUS? You can’t be... Go LOOK at one in the flesh.

I think you’re blind. The new products from Lexus are gorgeous. I don’t think you’ve seen one in person based on this.

The Lexus RC is not ugly.

In many ways, yes. I’m talking about planned obsolescence from a materials point, mainly. Of you’ve ever studied the composition of many crucial materials in their vehicles, you will always see something that was intentionally designed to fail sooner than possible (mostly on a basis of time, not use). BMW does this:

BMW is the king at planned obsolescence. They also apply it stylistically and probably in software, too.

Most of them still have remnants of body-camouflage. Some also have visible test-spec parts. They are pre-production and test vehicles for sure.

By all means, hand over your $90,000.

No, no. Nope. Nope. Nope nope nope nope. Nope.

Marcello Gandini is better than you people. The EB110 is great.

A traditional transmission, actually.

I’m sorry, what are you reading? He never lied to anyone. Not disclosing something is not lying. Lemon Law filing is NOT a lawsuit. It is a simple state condition that can be met with certain prerequisites. If the dealer is refusing to diagnose an issue on the car, it is some serious grounds for suspicion.

It doesn’t matter if it’s broken or not. I’ve been through Lemon Law twice and on one of my vehicles from 2012 (a Honda) I basically proved that a certain piece in the shitty transmission contained a design flaw (where the Honda rep then accidentally let slip that they knew there was a flaw and it affected every

I’ve been through Lemon Law TWICE. I know how it plays out and every little detail. He has to give the dealer a certain number of chances to fix it (varying by state) and if they don’t or can’t, you show up to a hearing with evidence and records proving your case (in my case I had documents proving Honda and the

Guy with the WRX: Have you ever heard of Lemon Law??! Your case would be perfect! You signed the agreement when you bought the thing new.

Mercedes-Benz have always been known to throw the entire list of codes when the battery is low OR if there are odd electrical current flunctuations in the system. They also throw all the codes after you change the battery and don’t keep power to it.