“If the audience is graying, Scanlon says, blame Detroit, which shifted from the fanciful fins and muscle cars of the ’50s and ’60s to a focus on reliability.”

“This would be funny if it weren’t such an abject failure of journalism. What you have is a writer who has already decided what is true, and then goes off in search of and voices to support that truth at the expense of anything that might say otherwise.”

Can’t tell if sarcasm or mere logic (Since Tesla loses money on EVERY car it sells)

This! SO MUCH THIS!

Yay! Another “status” car from the fake automaker known as Tesla. (Let me know when they make money actually selling cars, instead of bullshit Wall Street hype)

Sold awfully damn good to be considered a “loser”.

He must be blinded by the Mazda lust that, for some reason, runs rampant around these parts.

Bu... But... Evil GM! Jalopnik said so! Drive Miata!

Why do people judge automakers based on beat-to-shit rental cars? No common sense, I guess.

“Tells me all I need to know about Jalopnik”

I tend to wonder the same thing about Miata owners.

I expect the next article to say: “Whatever, it’s a [insert german automaker here]” when we’re talking about reliability, as well.

My wife’s family has one. 100K and no problems at all.

“Whatever, it’s GM.”