vulcanwithamullet--disqus
Vulcan With a Mullet
vulcanwithamullet--disqus

If only they literally "literally" rolled Hollywood studio executives like this with actual punches, and then  threw them under actual buses, movies would be much better, although public transportation would be prohibitively expensive due to the coverage of many lawsuits.

Dan Savage, Randy Savage and Michael Savage should all get together on a reality show. 
They could call it…"The Aristocrats."

Of course, this makes complete sense. The Netflix switchboard operator can't deal with all of those freaky changes in content flow… he can't move his hands fast enough.

You can't stop Rule 34. THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS!!!!!

"I'm trying to envision Corian counters for this kitchen set-up, but polished marble just keeps popping into my mind. Should I go with my gut? It's never lied to me yet."

And I love the image of the "Rule 34 artists" as a collective. Like a sweatshop in Manchuria with a bunch of shirtless guys scribbling frantically on Wacom tablets, trying to create the porn version of Monsters University as soon as the bootleg DVDs hit the streets.

This isn't faux dive, this is real dive!

I propose that the sound piped into the monorail as it moves play "Monorail… Monorail…"

I think they're all like, "No, it's a plausibility issue, dude, a 45-year-old woman would never be a stripper." Well…. you just have to go to the right strip clubs.

Although the topic is Friends, I guess this is a good place as any for me to vent about the fact that I always hated "Homer's Enemy."

At least it was a better handjob than the Star Wars prequels. Those were like a handjob from George Lucas using steel wool and a baseball glove.

The key thing to remember when using the term "pretentious" is the fact that it "should" refer to something/someone who lacks the intelligence that he or she is attempting to display (and, by extension, also lacks the self-awareness of his or her ignorance).

@avclub-b0dae075785888267fc19871f3e7dab7:disqus No problem, I'll meet you nitpick for nitpick :) I'm in the form of a Vulcan for a reason. 
I tend not to wade into these issue related comments since the Internet is a… less than ideal environment for reasoned debate, for a lot of reasons (one being that nuance and

You see, the meaningless of the sex performed by non-famous people is a comment on the meaninglessness of life in general under the dark sky of doom in Von Trier's world, which, like our world in many ways, also features several instances of bony, angsty, pale Euro-Aryans having actual, un-simulated, existentially

Just to be clear, I never wanted anyone to think that I was saying some women deserve abuse. Nobody deserves abuse. I also know it's not as easy as "just drop the zero and get yourself a hero!"

1. That's a partially correct interpretation of what I said. I do believe that 100 percent of people are susceptible to gut-level prejudices that can possibly weigh their moral judgment. This is human culture and probably nature, from the bad side.

A politically incorrect but sadly accurate fact is that some women want to be abused, either physically, emotionally, or both. And that some of these women find Brown's behavior any degree from arousing to irrelevant, with a bell curve in the area of "subconsciously enticing."

Seriously! How do they hang their cigarettes off the lip like that when they're talking? I've tried it and it doesn't work unless you're slurring "ehhhh… ennui… merde… riens… nausee…"

We're so jaded… not only does this seem like a great publicity stunt, wait 'till next year. They're already scheduled for a real outbreak of zombie virus and a dirty bomb explosion in Nice.