Careful, snowflake, you’re starting to sound triggered.
Careful, snowflake, you’re starting to sound triggered.
Ok cool, and what documentation will you be providing today, sir (or madam)? Long-form birth certificate? Doctor’s note? Perhaps references from your parents, friends, and/or local pastor? You can never be too careful, you know. I know this must seem like a terrible imposition and invasion of your privacy (and it…
Ok cool, so I assume you will be ready to provide documentation on demand for the legitimacy of your alleged penis, sir (or madam)? We have to ask everyone, you know, obviously. It’s the only way to be fair.
I am. I am seriously asking how you are going to enforce this rule. How do you know?
Not nearly good enough. The shelter has to keep out all trans men, right? I mean, that’s the only way you’ll know you’re “safe,” right? You can’t just deny the ones who don’t “pass,” right? So I’ll ask again: How do you know?
I have a question for you. Let’s say, hypothetically, that you are at a shelter with 6 other men. A number between 0 and 6 of these other men are trans. This means (by your definition) that between 0 and 6 of these other men are really women pretending to be men and should be excluded from this shelter. How do you…
That’s an impressively inflated sense of self-importance you have there, Mr. Random Dipshit on the Internet.
Jesus where are all you idiots coming from? Is there a convention in town?
Wow. Even more trash in the comments than usual today. I thought Monday was trash day.
Still not seeing it even though it’s right in front of you.
You were SO close for a second there.
Jesus christ what a dipshit.
Ok, one last time and then I swear I’m done: YOU are the source of this alleged “evidence” and I find YOU an untrustworthy source. Therefore, any “evidence” YOU provide (regardless of where it comes from) will not be accepted. There is no “divorced” here. YOU are posting and thus YOU are the source. I don’t know how…
I have answered your question. I will not accept any “evidence” you provide. I do not accept you. Do you understand that, sunshine?
From you? No. No I will not accept any “evidence” from you. You are not a reliable source of information. You are a turd on the Internet. You are here solely for the purpose of stirring up shit and then complaining when nobody wants to play Calvinball by your made-up rules. So no, I will not accept anything from…
I don’t think “self-evident” means what you think it means. It does not, in fact, mean “things that I tell myself are evidence.”
I’m not suggesting anything other than that you are probably an idiot.
So let’s be clear here: Your required criteria for conceding this argument is that you want the name (and presumably formal death certificate) of a person who yelled “I believed Evangeline Lilly!” as they died of Covid?
Just want to make sure I’ve got that right.
In the writer’s defense, I believe it is obligatory for everyone involved in the Golden Globes in any capacity to be rip-roaring drunk. This includes online re-cappers.
It’s attached to Bam Margera.
I’ve enjoyed all of these shows so far (currently watching Midnight Club) but the term “Flanaverse” makes me want to hate them. Can we just ... not?