Its only fitting that the 3 companies should lose out to a not a real luxury brand since they’ve spent the last 2 decades downgrading for more sales. Now with them all pushing touch screens and fake leather I’m not sure any of them deserve the crown.

Apparently “luxury” is just related to price, because the Model 3's interior is anything but “luxurious”

First: Tesla is not a luxury brand. Convince me I’m wrong. The model S can pass for luxury, but not the 3/Y where the bulk of sales sit. Sure they offer huge amounts of technology, but that’s not “luxury”, unless we’re collectively agree to redefine luxury as high tech 

Putting important if not quite mission-critical functions on a touchscreen might not be the recipe for long term reliability either.

door handles that break because theyre frozen and some ape tugs on them like its their pecker and breaks it arent problems. theyre actively destroyed. a door handle that just decides fuck you i dont wanna and you have to pay a thousand bucks to fix it is very different.

umm, no.

I think it is more about identifying where they live than protecting their identity. Yes, a thief could see your car in a parking lot and get the same info. However, there is a presumption that listing an item for sale at your home is more enticing to criminals than seeing a basic car randomly in a parking lot. Sort…

Very fitting for a Scat Pack.

He blew $9k on upgrades.  It sucks but he doesn't need a gofundme

I mean, based on the numbers it looks like they sold less than a hundred (closer to 50) a year. So they’re pretty damn rare.

I spun out and flew off a mountain and died. 

Rally 2.0 was where I finally hit my skill ceiling based on equipment running an xbox remote on PC, there just wasn’t a way to get faster trying to jiggle buttons and shift/ebrake etc. That game looks flipping amazing and should for 100 gig install.

“The car runs and drives, but there are a few issues that need to be ironed out”

If you need to tell people you are not a “monster,” you are probably a monster.

The Suzuki SX4 in the blog post header pic is actually the right answer.

Shes fucking guilty. There was a point where she knew she was doing something wrong and did it anyways. Then there was another point where she kept doing it. There was probably also a point where she acknowledged she would be in big trouble if anyone found out what she was doing and probably did other bad shit to make…

Who hurt you?

I understand the point the CS rep was trying to make with this terrible response “You can’t take back what you said” or maybe “you can’t unbake a cake” kind of thing. Only:

Maybe this is a new concept for you, but you should look up the concepts of “opinion” and “paraphrasing”.

dude, conflating “the rich” with even the low low bar of being able to afford a *brand new* Porsche is a good example of how this electorate couldn’t recognize good economic redistribution policy to save their lives