No, my contention/confusion is how it relates to this specific event being in line or against military policy.

Thanks for the link, sir, but it did not really illuminate your argument. Please provide a more specific link.

Oath to follow orders, yes, was this an order of the President?

Sharia-esque Law in Arkansas? What a world.

You are pretty presumptuous, clearly trying to get me to engage in your behavior, but I’ll just leave it at you acknowledging what they did was against military policy. Thanks for agreeing.

“They are following their oaths and a silly flag will get them some punishment.” What?

Double post - didn’t mean to spam.

Well, a lot of experts on military law would disagree, some pretty conservative experts too.

And as for your second point, that’s your right to interpret it as such, but since he’s a registered candidate (with or without a registered opponent) it would benefit his campaign in my view.

I didn’t put any words in your mouth, you admitted yourself that there would a good case that this would be against the catch-all 4.1.5.

I’ve read your other clarifications, which also admit this is likely in violation of the rules (at least one catch-all by your own admission) despite the fact that you refuse to acknowledge that Mr. T is already a registered candidate for 2020.

So, they are in violation of the rules is your basic end-point.

Could you?

I will agree that overuse of Nazi can diminish it’s meaning, although the overuse of “Nazi” is not a recent thing, it’s been used to describe bad (in the eyes of their opponents) people since Hitler died.

More ESL-quality insults.

Calling you out for being wrong isn’t an insult, it might be insulting to your pride to be wrong, but it’s not an insult and wasn’t intended to be. Once you actually started insulting me, I came right back with it.

In the 7 seconds between failure and crash? Maybe confused and scared, didn’t know what to do? Was daydreaming?

Nope, none of what you said is correct.

Seems like you’re the one with the hurt feelings, bud.

With an active full-on engagement against China? Zero additional fronts (of any real significance), you focus on China.