Climate change is real, deplorable, and it is man-made. Put your head in the sand all you want but you won’t be able to ignore its effects.
Climate change is real, deplorable, and it is man-made. Put your head in the sand all you want but you won’t be able to ignore its effects.
“A Brain-Invading Parasite Is Believed to Be Spreading Because of Infinitely Scrolling Blogs”
Could explain the results of the last election.
When I was in 8th grade a classmate groped me pretty forcefully so I took my bigest textbook and swung it at his face and gave him a bloody nose.
Of course they’re annoying. They’re all fucking lying, right?
Bare minimum would be right, because 3/4 have 2+ children average. Plus other close family members who were exposed to the abuse.
in my own family
noun nui·sance \ˈnü-sən(t)s, ˈnyü-\
an annoying or troublesome person, thing, or situation
Even weirder, Nunes said the case wasn’t related to Russia. So either he lied to try to cover for 45, or there is another, completely separate investigation going on that Trump & Goons managed to get themselves into. It’s the classic “I couldn’t have committed a murder, I was robbing a bank at the time!” defense.
If I get swept up in some surveillance of a Mafioso, I better hope we are just sharing marinara recipes.
YOU ARE THE FUCKING SWAMP, GRASSLEY
Assault is the crime of making an attack, regardless if the attack was successful or not. Holding a knife to a throat or shooting a bullet that misses by half a foot is still a criminal act even though no injuries resulted.
IIRC, his wife was a witness and called an ambulance
It seems that someone you generally agree with is probably a critical thinker whereas someone who uses critical thinking, but that you disagree with wears “the cloak of critical thinking”.
I’m sorry that you listen to Sargon of Akkad on a regular basis. He is a tool. I’m not really going to try to argue with your opinion of him, though. It’s clear that you respect his opinion, which I think is a terrible mistake, because he is very good at making very bad arguments sound good.
The problem is, people like Sargon of Akkad encode dogwhistle ignorance into discussions supposed to be couched in “critical thinking” discussion, which is poisonous to a movement (critical thinking rationalism) that is absolutely essential to the improvement of mankind.
Yet you offer no dissenting opinions and just throw out dumb insults while erroneously considering yourself clever. Though I’m not surprised you’d chime in here - Sargon of Akkad is the YouTube poster child for manboys who erroneously think themselves much, much cleverer than they actually are.
Sargon of Akkad is one of the worst things to happen to the rationalism movement that has been growing more popular on YouTube.
And he shaped it like lipstick and fucking named it Mensez.