The first Formula 1 game by Psygnosis has a “feature” similar to this. There’s a hidden menu in-race where you can activate the camera meant to be shown during replays. The issue is the cameras are all very long pan shots, along with if you happen to hit the grass you go into a fantastic spin and lose a lot of time.

Nipples are the windows to sin.

I always loved Starship Troopers edited for television.

You have to be 17 to see *nipples*. You can look at the whole boob just fine, as long as the nipple is covered. Which also struck me as so dumb. 

It does consistently baffle me that you can show people hearts ripped out of their chests to 13 year olds, but you have to be 17 to see boobs (unless you have an internet connection).

The MPAA is really cracking down on “mild comic mischief” these days.

Now you’ve got me seriously wondering if anyone has ever hung dong in IMAX before. 

And the anti-Oppenheimer movie, Barbie, also features copious nudity of its female and male leads, but since they’re Barbie and Ken that didn’t require an R rating.

Is he packing a Fat Man or a Little Boy?

(Oppenheimer pulls his pants down)

Disgusting. How dare Nolan/Hollywood pervert the all ages story of the father of mass atomic death with adult sexuality/nudity!

If you’re gonna make what is essentially a fan film then just put it on Youtube for free. Otherwise, come up with your own IP.

Guarantee WB didn’t change its mind. It’s probably being screened under the festival license (which allows you to do stuff like this.)

You realize you lose 99% of your credibility by starting with an EpochTimes article as your primary source?

No evidence was provided by the plaintiffs. None.

I highly doubt the discovery in this case proved the Administration was actively working with companies to remove any content that wasn’t criminal in nature. What this judgement does, essentially, is reinforce the lie that Biden is censoring the free speech of right wingers. This is ammunition for Greene and Boebert.…

Shocker.

They produced at least one slimmed-down model for each of their four consoles preceding the PS5. The original had the PSOne, the PS2 had the Slim, the PS3 had the Slim & Super-Slim, and the PS4 also had a Slim. Or did I misunderstand your point (always a possibility)?

The point of a Slim model is the same as it always is, to streamline production and cut costs. No matter when you introduce a revision there’s always going to be that period where they still have old models they need to sell, but you also have to consider the people out there (like myself) who have been holding out…

Not really. Sony’s whole case (and by virtue, the FTC case) is completely dependent on getting a judge to say “Nintendo isn’t a competing console maker”. Without that statement, Sony’s whole case falls apart. At that point, all MS does is point as Nintendo and say “They’re #2 and they haven’t had a Call of Duty since…