veeteef
VeeTeeF
veeteef

You’re right, my bad. He didn’t cure them, he just paid for 100% of their treatment. This monster must be stopped.

He didn’t “cure” blind people

My guy, you have no idea what a company town is.

The history of company towns in the US relied on the company controlling:

1) Transportation
2) Goods and services flowing into the town

Remember the time this guy literally cured some blind people and a bunch of fucks on Twitter wanted him guillotined for it.

Except he hasn’t actually created a company town?

He bought five houses. There are 87,000 people in Greenville.

Yeah, but “Popular Streamer buys subdivision for his employees to live in” doesn’t quite fit the narrative they’re pushing of “bad rich man creates company town, isn’t capitalism bad?” to get those outrage clicks.

Calling 5 houses “an entire neighborhood” is a bit of a stretch, no?

Employer provides incredible benefits package, using money earned from doing good deeds. Kotaku: “Isn’t that terrible?

Let’s be honest. 99% of the people who criticize Mr. Beast would *love* him if he spent all of his money on himself but made 5 minute videos one a month about how evil capitalism is.

I REALLY don’t get the tone of this article. The writer legit sounds offended that this dude is nice enough to purchase actual freakin homes for his employees...

It’s why entities such as Faux News and SnoozeMax are such a problem. They’re very good at brainwashing and pushing out disinformation.

Nah. The whole point of gas is BTU's NOW! and that sort of appliance doesn't meet that need.

Or they’ll just buy these:

When banning gas stoves was floated in my part of California, conservatives on my neighborhood app were screaming about how the libtards were going to take their gas stoves. They really thought the government would somehow come into their home and not only confiscate their stove but force them to buy a new one. Even

Why is your shitty ass video player still shitty? Here is “full screen.”

I want to rip my eyes out every time I read the headline “internet reacts to X,Y,Z. It’s ALWAYS some pointless fluff piece containing screenshots of 3 tweets from people I’ve never heard of or care about.

and later today or tomorrow, IGN will have copied the article from Kotaku.

Not just Kotaku. Half the articles on The Root and a bunch on Jez are just posting some shitty take they saw on Twitter with other tweets from people with less than 1,000 followers to back them up.

Kotaku rarely does that anymore.