veeteef
VeeTeeF
veeteef

Honestly, if you haven’t played it yet: keep waiting. I enjoyed the game a good bit, but I also played it on a 3080 and a solid chunk of it was how absolutely gorgeous of a game it is. I think it’s a game worth playing and while it’s certainly flawed, most of the criticisms have been exaggerated (again, remember I

Don’t know what to tell you. Maybe the error is on the other side of the screen.

Long-press the clock on your home screen - you should have a sizing-frame pop up.

Sounds more like a specific hardware issue you’re having.

At this point, I’ll take a 4/5 scale Accord over another CUV.

This was my point earlier. The GTI is $150 more but gets 40% more horsepower. The latest generation of GTI isn’t living up to the unreliability stereotypes of yesteryear(2000's)

GTIs have not had timing belts since the MK5 generation. In 2010, they got the EA888 motor(still used, now 3rd gen of motor) with a timing chain. 1st gen EA888 motors had timing chain tensioner issues(see Torch’s article on it) but 2nd and 3rd gen have fixed that as well. The MK7(current/outgoing) uses the 3rd gen

“Rev Hang” is the bane of most modern manual equipped vehicles. At some point about 5 years ago MFG’s figured out that closing the throttle body fast is bad for emissions, so they tune them to close slowly and you get rev hang. Couple that with heavy flywheels to make them more forgiving and you get a less than

But VW and Honda are not interchangeable.

Totally different target buyer. The Civic buyer wants a little fun, maybe, with a huge side of almost zero upkeep. The GTI buyer wants a lot of fun for a reasonable price-and deals with the higher maintenance costs as a result.

I do not understand, after how good the last gen 3 hatch looked, the Mazda design team arrived at the awful C pillars on the new 3. Mazda’s current design language is great, the 3 sedan looks great, and every other part of the 3 hatch looks great, but those absurd C-pillars and the endless expanse of metal that is the

sorry to be a spoiler... integra will probably be a cushy type r with comfy seats and different lights. 

I'd be willing to bet the Civic has better rear visibility than the Mazda hatchback

I like it, but there is no way I’m paying over $29k for a Civic. It’s $8k more than the base model. That’s kind of ridiculous.

A long time ago, my mother was looking for a cushy minivan because she has trouble getting in and out of a vehicle and needs enough space to carry a walker.

Why are you comparing a Honda Civic to a BRZ/GR 86?

That is a liftback, not a hatchback. So, for that matter, is the Civic.

I wish hatchbacks didn’t have to be so “fastback”. Imagine how much more cargo capacity this would have if it were more squared off like a VW golf or Ford Focus. The cargo capacity would split the gap between the HRV and CRV. 

That’s not a fair comparison though because they aren’t even remotely the same cars.  One is a FWD four-door quasi-hatchback.  The other is a two-door two-seater...

you have to go all the way to the top, $29,400 for the Sport Touring, to get the manual option back.