Your sad devotion to that ancient religion is beginning to cloud your judgement.
OMGits another burner
vbnmgg
If that’s really the same kids, I’ll totally give this a pass, this is catering to your market, not pandering to it.
I fully support their cash-in after the whole world shared a video they would probably have rather forgotten about.
Yeah, but fuck Apple.
He certainly can't spell it.
the fetishization of apple is starting to get weird.
because that would’ve broken the post.
You don’t have to believe it. I assume that you won’t. Of course the comparison was made in jest, but was in no way a disparagement to either party (these guys or people with autism). It is you who made the false equivalency of “autistic=derogatory”. Had I said that his head motions reminded me of my cat following a…
We dropped the only Atomic weapons ever used in war and they still can’t drive on the right side of the road?
Must be Friday http://jalopnik.com/5876604/this-i…
No. It wasn’t. How stupid of you to assume that it was.
Eh hem. Eh hem. Excuse me, I seem to have a frog in my throat. Eh hem (this list is bullshit). Eh hem! [I’m just joking, not really complaining. Well ok, a tiny bit.]
Now playing
Honorable mentions: SEGA Rally 2.
You all sound like some suckers, that turtle is fucking rad.
Relax.
Most of the women are not actually very good in the ring. But the “progressive” people can’t recognize that. All they see is “the women’s division being treated as a sideshow”.
When you incorrectly describe filings, then seek clarification on process after you publish, how can you presume to be factual? If your conceit is that being correct about ESPN’s intentions confers universal accuracy, great. But, and you’ve actually written to this effect before, “...it’s not worth my time to seek out…
Why didn’t you ask these questions before you published? If you don’t understand the law or legal process, isn’t it a reasonable step to make sure your article is accurate before you publish?