I applaud the AV Club stance on this!

“Sure it was mega condescending, but did you ASK women about it? Some women love being condescended to, probably! I haven’t asked them, but that sounds plausible to me!!”

Yeah, that Kim Kardashian mobile game (which was on that list) was trending earlier because thousands of women were sarcastically saying it was their favorite game, in response to E3's tweet. They weren’t raging about it, but mostly mocking how stupid the article was.

I mean, “I don’t want to associate with this person because I find them awful,” doesn’t seem immature to me. Like, I can enjoy media and personalities that are problematic or toxic to varying degrees, but I have to take them in context. The context here is that it’s 2020, and Doug TenApel was involved, so within that…

“Everyone is entitled to their own opinion when it comes to politics or social politics.”

“I’m cool with racism and homophobia.” - Supernoper, August 10, 2020

might as well burn all art and media before the 1980s then

I’m sorry, but we “canceled” fucking Nazis back in 1945. My grandfather didn’t die killing those fucks so people like this asshole and you can have a “difference of opinion”. He should be punched in the face at every opportunity. As for your “both sides” comment. Your Gamergate is showing. Fuck off.

A. One doesn’t exclude the other.

Those can both be problems.

Both things suck

Imagine being so gross that you actively defend jeff bezos. jesus christ.

Well, millions of gamers can’t afford multiple consoles. There’s also the point that PS is getting more than a character. Spider-Man will have his own missions, public events, etc to go along with it. They’re really asking for millions of gamers who WANTED and ASKED for Spider-Man to pay the same price for a game on…

cannot blame Sony for doing so; same reason why Bezos doesn’t pay Amazon workers more: doesn’t have to!

Speaking as someone who would be playing it on a PS5 - this really sucks, and people should hate exclusive DLC.

Funny, it bugs me when SC apologists ignore Roberts’ famous

I hate to break it to you, but it’s been longer than even 8 years. Like most Kickstarter projects the work actually started before the Kickstarter campaign. Development, according to the developers themselves, actually started in 2010. So Star Citizen has been in development for at least 10 years.

always bugs me when I put the number of years since the game was kickstarted into the headline and forget that development actually started in 2010-11.

If you don’t count the kickstarter that kickstarted the development as development time then.....what the hell counts as development? They had already built a prototype and were starting on development of the game. The fact that they continued to bloat their game during the development time doesn’t mean that it…

“Always bugs me when people say it’s been in development for 8 years.” It bugs you when people speak accurately about the game?