Both the Hornet and SU-30 excel at getting the nose on target. Roll rate goes to the Hornet.
Both the Hornet and SU-30 excel at getting the nose on target. Roll rate goes to the Hornet.
The landing is impressive until you remember that they can’t test it on a real aircraft carrier without cutting though the deck. Still, I say we give things a positive spin and call it a unique ground attack capability.
Q1: Distributed Aperture System. There’s a camera for that purpose.
So your assertion is that Federal water projects from the 1930’s to the 1950’s paved the way for settling the American southwest during the late 1860’s, and that justifies Federal control of western lands that occurred during the Progressive Era of the 1890’s.
I have apparently argued with a fool and won an…
And I thought the military were heroes?!
I have a hunting rifle that will rip through the best US army body armor like it wasn’t there. .338WinMag takes down an alaskan grizzly with one shot.
I can’t tell if you’re kidding or not? Surely you witnessed the last decade of struggles in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Hmm. Actually, angry and poorly armed conspiracy theorists are a pretty good model for the guerilla-like organizations that the US actually face as opponents. What if they just try to get them to take up arms, as a part of the practice? A meta-conspiracy theory :D
That’s also a big part of why rural states get more money from the Federal Government then they pay in taxes. Those Federal lands have to be maintained somehow.
That’s actually part of the sticking point with these people. Western states have obnoxiosly high rates of Federal land control. For example, 84.5% of Nevada is controlled by the Federal Government. That control wasn’t always legitimately obtained either. The ink had barely dried on the Treaty of Guadelupe Hidalgo…
Ask Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the Taliban how the full might of the American military is doing against them.
You would be surprised. Look at history, there are multiple occasions where a small indigenous force bested much larger well equipped forces. If your not willing to bomb whole areas into oblivion killing more civilians than combatants, things get difficult. A small group armed with nothing but hunting rifles can make…
Yeah, because no lightly armed insurgency has ever outlasted the US Military. :rolleyes:
Have you been paying attention to Iraq and Afghanistan at all? You do realize that the very point of military training is to equip the military to deal with exactly that scenario? The guys with bolt action hunting rifles and vietnam era mortars are dangerous for precisely the reason that people like you dismiss them.
Picture didn’t upload.
It’s getting pretty nuts around Austin, especially in Williamson County, which is the seat of Tea Party/White Power/Tinfoil Militia in Central Texas. Local militia groups are planning to “oversee” the operations and do anything necessary to guarantee no constitutional rights of legal American citizens are violated.…
These guys managed to fend off much larger forces.
By all means then, please justify it.
your "irrational hatred" is my "exposing the Emperor's new clothes"
For a second I though this pilot was in big trouble launching with air brakes extended before I remembered it must be the VTOL hatch.