Vanilla is the niche in question, now you're throwing in the sub niche's on top of that and does not make it any less niche, contrarily it makes it even more niche.

I didn't make it evident that I wasn't open to alternatives either. Assumptions man, assumptions.

I smell what you’re cooking. But, part of the subscription fee is used to develop New Content, Legacy is by it’s own definition Old Content. It’s stripped down to (one of) it’s most basic forms and re-distributed, and that would be the only major difference I can see.

Is this safe for work is my one question?

It’s possible that it could open a lot of doors, initially. But I think the problem really boils down to be multifaceted.

Anyone who seriously says the customer is always right has never worked for customer service lol

Did you really compare Not Killing People Petitions to World of Warcraft Legacy Petitions? All that shows is how backwards people's priorities are when they care more about a silly game than about how people are actually treated.

Dude, they're using the same Character Models, Map Designs, Level Structure, Music Score, Textures, Lighting, Quests, Raids, Monsters, Skills, Flavor Texts, Items, Need I go on? It looks like a duck, it walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck....brother it's a Duck.

Here’s another meaning to fair use, Fair use is a legal doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders.

I never made the statement like it was the only possibility. It was an example of as you put it, one niche group got something that the other niche groups want, which then becomes a circular whirlpool of complaining. Best thing to do is as Blizzard mostly does, ignore it.

I’m in an area where I can’t watch the video, so I can only read the article. As for Private Servers, they always crop up regardless, their existence does not necessitate demand for a Legacy Server, because...and here’s the big difference...they’re free to play on most of the time.

It’s not too far fetched, there are some people who like Exclusivity in their items and having something be really expensive is a means to do that. Making it cheaper, in turn to this group cheapens the acquisition of the item.

I think you missed the actual point of the article. Blizzard isn’t saying that it’s players don’t know what they want, in fact they’re all very transparent about it. The problem is, that there are many Sub-Divisions within the game itself that conflict with one another.

Disgree

They have an official release date, nothing optimistic about it.

I’m the same, I get more information from reading something than watching something. It’s also why I prefer a good book over a good movie, it feels more active to me, like I have to use my brain to process and translate and even visualize. Video is just so...mentally lazy to me that it can go right in one ear and out…

I would suggest you read the entire discussion I had with Fuelpowered. We kind of beat this discussion into the ground and came to a mutual understanding, of which I'm not going to repeat it all.

Almost feels like a declaration of war against CoD. CoD keeps going into the distant future, DICE see’s a good chunk of their fanbase wants them to go back to WWI/II and makes a game that fit’s that demand.

We’re off the point here. I’m not saying you need 100% transparency to avoid being two-faced, what I’m saying is that going out of your way to be fake nice/polite is two-faced, there are many other ways you can interact with someone you dislike/hate that is neither hateful or phony .

I'm one of those horribly literal people that doesn't catch sarcasm. Plus, there are people who honestly think Freedom of Speech means they can say what they want without accountability, might as well nip that in the bud while you can lol