I’d say neither. You’re being indifferent and ignoring what is happening around you and is neither courteous or respectful towards the child or the parent, but you also not being rude.

Not really. The only difference is how active you are in their death, death is death regardless how it comes and you’re still wishing the end of their life.

Ahh, that makes sense. It’s just the phrasing that caught me off guard. Yeah, eventually racism(Hopefully) vanishes. It will take a long time though, probably won’t see it gone in my life time but hopefully somewhere around my grandchildren's or great-grandchildren's.

How do you know she won’t be his life partner? How does anyone know who they’re going to spend the rest of their life with? You don’t know till you give the relationship a chance. This isn’t a Whim either, this is a hard stance he’s making saying he does not agree with their beliefs. Eventually everyone has to leave…

Polite: having or showing behavior that is respectful and considerate of other people.

That’s an interesting idea there. Maybe a notification on the review itself as well to state what Patch this game was in during the review as well as remind people that a game has been updated as a notification of some kind.

First amendment only prevents the Government from creating laws and punishing people for what they say. As a Private Company, Valve can remove whatever comments/reviews/accounts they want for whatever reason as they own that digital space.

At the last point, reviewing an EA game while it's still EA could be beneficial for people looking to purchase the game in That State. They could then see how the games developed, how reviews have changed and how much effort the developer put into it. It can give someone buying the retail release at least an idea of…

I would disagree. Being Two-Faced is different than being polite, if you vehemently hate and can’t stand a person but you’re super sweet and nice to them in person is just you being fake.

I disagree that family will always be there, and is honestly a rose-tinted view of an ideal. There are plenty of people, myself included, where Family was the first group of people to leave you behind and it was your friends who came to pick you up. Also, if he marries his Girlfriend, she becomes his Wife which is His…

I'd prefer they learned better and saw the errors of their ways. Wishing death upon them is very similar to how they feel about people of another race.

There are valid reasons for censorship, removing a “review” that was just ascii art fits that bill in my opinion. Plus Steam is private domain and they can remove whatever they want without reason if they want to, since they own the services and review spaces.

I liked 3 better, from the macabre summoning, the story directions and characters, I just enjoyed 3 a whole lot more. 4 just felt plain to me, but still a really good game.

Why choose? I have all Fall and Winter to play them to my hearts content :)

I agree, as a whole the franchise has been overly serious in it's numbered iterations. If more of the game was like Hildebrand I might actually think it was worth a regular subscription, but as it is with it's rehashing of content...I'll just wait till Hildebrand is out in full effect to subscribe again.

Even 14 has a cash shop. I honestly can’t think of a good reason for them to have one as a Subscription base, people are already paying monthly for their content but even some of that is hidden behind the cash wall. Add to that a really redundant endgame that relies on repackaging old content as new just isn't a good…

Literally the only reason I resub to XIV now and again is to see what new adventures Hildebrand goes on. Otherwise the endgame remains as mindless and dull as ever.

Eh, I don’t think Nintendo would be able to outstrip 3rd Party ever. They’re one company who has a handful of games, while they are beloved by many, generally are formulaic in their approach.

That’s why there’s Terms of Service, the owner of the Domain can create their own rules and decide punishments within their rights. In this case, it seems like Riot finally decided to take out one of the more popular Trolls in a show of force. Hopefully people won’t think they’re above the ToS they themselves agree to…

Let’s not forget the first amendment only protects the public from the Government deciding what is and is not okay to say publicly. As a Private Domain, games, websites, business can stipulate their own rules and decide what is and is not acceptable to say within their territory.