Like Democrats don't bullshit, too.

There is some dispute about whether he intentionally made a false statements. And Hillary Clinton also made false statements under oath, so it's rather hypocritical to focus on Sessions.

And who decides what counts as false? For instance, an oft-repeated claim is that Clinton had a budget surplus in his last two years. But that's only if you include SS surplus as "revenue". So … fake news or not? Another claim is that if you're selling guns at a gunshow, you don't have to do a background check of your…

Oh, forgot the game clock is presented as tome remainng, rather than time elapsed.

You said "Climate change? That's destroying everything FOREVER." So that can be reasonably read as meaning that all species, or at least humans, will go extinct.

Bullshit. Climate change is not an extinction event.

Government does kill jobs through regulations. The question is whether those jobs are ones we want done. Argue that regulations prevent costs that are larger than the ones they cause, but don't argue they don't have costs.

"Trump's first term"
The most disturbing part of your post is the possibility that that qualifier may become necessary.

"And I'm not interested in carrying water for these assholes just because I have a dick."

What they should have done is shot the scenes in 1980.

There's nothing "Trumpian" about freely acknowledging that your assumptions are, in fact, assumptions.

I think you meant to say "since his election, hamburglary is up by 27%". Without the comma, it your statement means "because his hamburglary of election is up by 27%". But I suppose that could be your intended meaning.

But forget about the whole "Team Evil watches" thing. And to check whether the gun is loaded.

But even if were true, it wouldn't address my point that saying something is in the past implies that it was in our universe.

Are you just spouting tongue-in-cheek techno-babble, or do you think this is a valid response?

In what sense is it meaningless? Is "Westerners" meaningless?

That would be "JAP".

Does he go around demanding that people listen to him yell at them?

1. There are some issues where no matter which side you take, there are people who will yell at you.
2. Democracy is based on the idea that decisions should be based on which side is supported by the most people, not which side is supported by the biggest assholes.
3. If opposing same sex marriage or denying climate…

Weird how the standard for "racist" has evolved from "hunting down and killing racial minorities" to "using non-preferred nomenclature".