It's hardly a "slur", though.

Ignoramus.

Not even in a "To Serve Man" sense?

A lawyer is someone you hire so you can say that all the shitty things you're doing is because your lawyer insisted you do them.

That was a decent American accent? I don't agree with all of Cinema Sins, but "Hans Gruber sounds like how Europeans think Americans talk. ::ding::" is spot on.

Stating that it took place "a long time ago" implies that there exists a timelike path from the events in the film to us. Otherwise, there can be no canonical time ordering.

So, does this exist in the same universe as Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.? If so, will Acker's character be Audrey Nathan?

There is, however, something a bit amusing about you carrying around a ripe tomato with you everywhere you go just in case you run into Whedon.

If you're going to complain about it, then I think it is reasonable to expect to address the question I asked recognitions: what better term is there?

"women falsely accusing men of raping them which will lead to men's lives being ruined. Which never happens."

"I just I wish academy voters would choose not to vote for people who has committed sexual harassment or assault"

"You're not willing to ignore all evidence to persist in believing every single rape claim. You must enjoy calling rape victims liars!" Is this a Poe or something?

I'm basing my argument on you making an absurd claim. You, on the other hand, are saying that you're unwilling to have a discussion with anyone who uses words you don't like, which just supports my original post. "SJW" is not a perfect term, but I haven't come across anything better. If you have a better term to…

The claim that women never make false rape accusations is so absurd it shows that it is pointless to try to have a discussion with you. Funny how SJWs go around being assholes, and then whine that they people they're dealing with have a "lack of empathy".

This is such a pervasive rhetorical fallacy, it's a shame it doesn't have a name. "We shouldn't give Oscars to sexual harassers" is not an actionable statement. To turn it into an action statement, it has to be reworded into something like "The Academy should have some standard for what constitutes 'sexual…

But the scalpers are getting more money. In the long run, this just makes for more ticket scalping. And how does he distribute the tickets he buys, and whatever method he uses, why doesn't he use that to distribute in the first place? It doesn't make any sense.

Were you going to finish that sentence?

So … he rewards ticket scalpers and encourages more people to do it in the future?

One of the annoying things about the world is not only how horribly ignorant of basic economic principles the vast majority of people are, but how objecting to their ignorance is considered sociopathic somehow.

Interesting how the photo has cropped the "J" off of "Jeep".