Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    urza4315
    TF
    urza4315

    How would you know? You haven’t seen it.

    Certainly, nothing is sacred. But that doesn’t mean people aren’t still going to be comparing an adaptation to the original - that much is inevitable especially when you still bear the name of the original work.
    And in my experience, people who don’t properly respect the source material usually don’t end up making very

    You’re gonna have to refer me to the exact chapter that this is crystallized cos I haven’t re-read all the chapters within the last couple months - specifically the part where it’s established that Eren is romantically interested in Mikasa, because I do not remember this part at all.

    And you could theoretically make a film adaptation of Romeo and Juliet where everybody doesn’t die horribly at the end. Nobody’s gonna stop you from doing it, but A) why call it Romeo and Juliet and B) the idea is still terminally stupid.

    It is, but very few vendors accept it and you need a minimum of 75 Science skill to use it.

    If this is what you believe... what do you think tax dollars and government for?

    What does it say if they don’t play a fighting game?

    Seriously, all of you people hanging on to the notion of honor need to get this into your mind. I saw this in Dark Souls, I saw this in Street Fighter, Skullgirls, League of Legends, Planetside 2, and more games you can shake a stick at.

    So on PC, which Ys games are worth playing? I played I and II, but Ys III looks like they tried to do what they did to Megaman by ‘westernizing it’ (aka horrible).

    Jesus, as much as I love the series I wouldn't consider Franken Fran as necessarily appropriate for even a seasoned veteran of the weird and wonderful world of anime/manga.

    Xenoblade’s sidequests were quite dull, yes, but playing on the Wii I really didn’t mind how dull they were until very late into the game, because they gave you an excuse to explore the world. The world was beautiful and detailed and as a bonus you can run into some interesting mini bosses tucked away in some

    Like Martin Luther King said, the most segregated hour in America is still 11am on Sundays.

    I think X is probably a game that could get away with it. The original Xenoblade had a lot of fetch quests, but those quests would often take you off the beaten path and show you so much of the beautiful world that you wouldn't otherwise see, and you come across lots of new and interesting enemies as well as mini

    A: Because it gives your company a bad reputation; if people lose confidence in Bioware products then that will negatively influence the sales of your next title, regardless of how much marketing hype EA puts behind it.

    B: Because of the long sales cycle. No doubt that DA:I is going to be part of many, many sales years

    And yet people play them. What does that tell you, that reasons for browser games to appeal to people don't exist, or just that you can't see or appreciate those reasons? Games are very much a "If you build it, they will come" affair.

    Ah, I understand now, this whole conversation is about why you don't like the game.

    Um, this is a turn-based strategy game we're talking about here, not sure why you would really need custom engines or the power of consoles/pcs. If browsers are good enough for Runescape, I'm sure Kan Colle has no problem running it. Indeed, judging from Youtube videos, the game looks to be what you would expect from

    And you're basing your statement on what - Zynga games? People have been making Flash games for browsers since forever and many of those have a bunch of depth and complex mechanics - far, far beyond your average cow-clicker.

    Emphasis on the 'browser' part? What's wrong with it being a browser game?

    The slap in the face was that weapon wasn't even that good.