Explore our other sites
  • jalopnik
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    urza4315
    TF
    urza4315

    "91% of rape victims are female and 99% of rapists are men."

    Presenting inaccurate medical information? No, the show presents 2 police officers, some kids, a pizza delivery guy, a couple housewives... None of whom (the surviving main cast) have any medical training whatsoever!

    I think consuming a massive dose of alcohol or perhaps smoking lots of cigarettes would produce a similar effect as well.

    You play the first time for the sheer experience, the second time for the challenge.

    The cat's not massaging the dog, it's studying the dog for anatomical weak points.

    Whenever I need to get somewhere fast in Skyrim, I just fast travel to the nearest landmark and Werewolf-sprint.

    I'm not familiar with American politics but I think it's a play on the idea that politicians from Texas etc. (see: G. Bush, that judge who beat his daughter) are just wired differently than people from the rest of the world and need special treatment.

    Damn, I feel bad for console players. Not only do they not get modding, but they have to resort to THIS if they want to cheat.

    Open the Low and Ultra pictures in new tabs in their full resolution, you will definitely see a difference. A large part of it is the shadow detail, depth of field, lighting, and textures. You can't see it by looking at the thumbnails.

    "If no one pirated a game ever. The industry would be doing a lot better than it is now."

    I don't know which ISP you're with that is so goddamn reliable, but for those who have less than 100% reliable internet connections, the fact that an internet-connection DRM game (such as Assassin's Creed) just pauses and doesn't even save for you becomes extremely annoying. Sure, in the grand scheme of things it

    How freaking big does a dog's bladder have to be to pee that much? In relation to the size of the rest of it's body, of course! I swear, little dogs are just walking bags of poop and piss.

    "I'm not sure where you hail from but, in the U.S., eating cats or dogs IS considered morally wrong..."

    I suppose my statement makes me sound a bit like someone who's played too much Call of Duty, doesn't it? I'm just trying to stay logical about it though, I don't think emotional impact is a good moral indicator. Otherwise some people would be able to argue that eating dogs and cats is morally wrong. Not that I eat

    I'm sorry that it creeps you out, but is it really wrong to suggest that an adult's life is at least worth as much as a child's?

    A materialistic measure of the value of someone's life hardly seems like a good basis for objective moral analysis of one crime over another, don't you think?

    Really? I tend to see it the other way round - if you're killed as an adult, then it's like you've done all this hard work in your life for nothing. Whereas if you kill a child, they haven't lost so much 'progress', if you will. Put it another way, it's like investing 500 hours in World of Warcraft only to have your

    I think this will help you.

    Can someone explain to me why killing a kid is 10 times worse than killing an adult? How exactly do we quantify the value of a human life?

    Nope. There's a lot of disgusting materials in your everyday life. Google them if you dare.