untangable
Sagaris
untangable

I really don't know why anybody is complaining, this movie looks fun, and it's nice to see a car movie with a big budget and real production value. Car movies by their very nature are supposed to be terrible and unrealistic. Sure there are a few good ones like american graffiti and drive, but for every one of those

Say what you will about the series, but for many it's still wildly entertaining. And, yes, the first movie introduced a lot of kids to illegal street racing and cheap car parts store mods that offered nothing more than letting everyone else around you know that you had no taste.

I don't know you; but from your various replies on this topic, it seems you are really afraid of motorcyclists when driving between lanes. I'm not sure what that stems from but clearly its a different experience than I've had.

I personally am of the opinion that laws cant help people from themselves. Just make any accident that involves a motorcycle and not my front bumper not my fault and ill be okay. Not that i think motorcyclists are idiots or unsafe or hate lanesplitting but it just takes one idiot motorcyclist misjudging the gap or in

I've also got no real issue with automated cars, but I'd prefer that it be more of an evolution of adaptive cruise control than a transportation pod with no controls. The people that don't feel up to driving don't have to (which is probably safer for all of us), and the people who want to drive can. In theory, it

I disagree, but I get where you're coming from. Lane splitting is dangerous when there's either a reckless biker or a clueless driver. Sometimes both. There are plenty of each out there, and they're ruining it for the rest of us.

What you're worried about is merely a symptom of a much bigger problem, though. IMO

They just need to not allow lane-splitting at all. The last thing I want to worry about is some idiot driving between me and another vehicle. It might be safer for the rider but it is more of a worry for me, they chose to ride a dangerous vehicle now live with the choices. Its bad enough worrying about a car in

murder typically requires the INTENT to kill someone. I don't see how the state can even charge them with "murder." manslaughter, sure.

Can't say that I can agree with #2. I use my GTR as my daily driver and I have yet to have any issues with it.

A lot of the criticism for how the GT-R drives could be leveled at many supercars that cost much more. It's remarkable that we're even talking about using it as a daily when it could crush nearly everything else on the market in performance terms while costing as little as it did in the beginning.

The same traits that

Not a super car, but it's pretty super. Sadly it'll soon be for sale to make room for the GT4.

It's what the people want, who am I to argue. I honestly would take a 488 over a 675LT any time any day.

And that's where speculation about the Mercedes shifter comes in. Mercedes' drive-by-wire automatic uses a small, column-mounted shifter that has a neutral center default setting, and then pushes up to engage reverse, and down to engage drive. Brody had the car only a couple months, since December, and it's likely

Last time being a smart ass I swear *crossed fingers*

I thought it was a meta dig at Ferrari having to rename their 2013 F1 car because Ford didn't want them to call it an F-150.

I'm the Anti-That Guy™ .

Um, other than the actual race cars and the supercars, I'm still calling the GT2RS the baddest, meanest, trackiest 911 ever.

I don't think it looks like a Tesla at all. It looks more like a Buick.

This end looks like a Dodge Dart with a Buick grill

"What's certain is that the V10 Plus' brakes stay cooler on a hot summer track day."

Is that so certain? The e-Tron would theoretically be leaning heavily on regenerative braking, and excuse my ignorance to the technology, but wouldn't that reduce the amount of waste heat being produced by the brakes, therefore