While that still sounds amazing, I miss the LFA V10 scream

Well, I didn't say GM was the only one. The inference was unintentional. However the majority of car maker who have Naturally Aspirated six-cylinder engines are basically letting them go to seed,while GM and a scant few others are actually working on making their NA-6s better, stronger, faster, cleaner engines.

While Sky's arguement could've probably presented his original case in a better man, do we really live in an age where saying the smallest thing immediately gets us accused of slut shaming? Just for an opinion?

Because our military needs it. /sarcasm

Ok I'm getting a lot of heated Jezebels jumping on my fucking throat about this and this is why I hardly comment on this blog. You have to carefully word anything contrary that you might say because you will get eviscerated for it. Lesson learned, don't omit any details on any kind of assumption. People can and will…

Why assume that it's men telling women to smile? I'm a woman and I've asked men to smile at work — they look upset and things aren't all that bad, goshdarnit! Always look on the bright side, and such.

I mean...depending on the context...this could be a dick move. I mean I've tried to cheer people up that look like they're having a bad day. If I said something like "smile! everything will work out!' and they pulled that, I might respond with "or you can go fuck yourself and die in a fire, you miserable asshole".

I like how everyone calls these people immature and then immediately decides that they should key their car. How mature of you, I can clearly see that you are a more upstanding member of society because you decided to react like a 10 year old and make two wrongs. This guy is an asshole, but by stooping to his level…

I guess I had high hopes of having a discussion about the merits of Sterling's brand of criticism and the perception that all criticism is equal. Those hopes were dashed.

Remember when I said let's try adding nuance? Is it just possible that I think both the dev and Sterling are in the wrong here? Is it possible to that I said so in the first paragraph of my initial comment? I'm not trying to deflect. It's possible to have multiple conversations about the subject.

Most of the comments on this page are probably going to be a variety of "can't take the heat, stay out of the kitchen" or whatever. In this case, perhaps it's appropriate. The dev, based on their response to Kotaku for info, are acting like petulant children. Perhaps they're not ready for the world of criticism.

Come on Travis... don't you feel kinda dirty just hitting the publish button on this story? Or was this someone pranking you by posting from your computer while you're predisposed on the toilet or something?

I think I see what you are saying about using federal law, but law is such a broad topic, I think it's perfectly acceptable to support some parts of it but want to eliminate others. Just because we like cars in general doesn't mean that we aren't allow to dislike certain models.

Psshhttt. Amateur.

Oh I love America and his company is quite impressive, I just disagree with his views on the future of the automobile and the recklessness of SpaceX. Also I disagree with how he portrays electric cars as vehicles with no consequences. The batteries have to be mined from somewhere and the electricity has to come from…

Yeah, I saw where you already stated that. I think we might have been typing at the same time...

I agree and do not agree with most of what they are saying but if that is what they want to present then let them. If you really want them to prove their point in a way that makes sense I doubt this articles attitude is going to be very productive in that respect.

It lived a full life and gave its all until the very end.

They have every right to look out for themselves. I'm just asking them to prove their point in a way that makes sense. So far with this wacko-bird freedom rhetoric, they haven't done that.

"V6"??? Sorry, but we might have to put your Jalopnik car on probation.