I’m actually pretty excited about it. If anyone can take the dismal reception of “Google Glass” and re-cast smart glasses into something useful and desirable, I think it’s probably Apple. AR really is the best new frontier for gadgetry. VR was always going to be an expensive nothingburger because it deprives you from…

You didn’t really spend much time playing with the AR thing did you?

Friendly reminder that the headset isn’t for you. This is a polished up development kit for a completely new platform that they’re launching to the public. Its 3000 bucks because they literally do not want you, the average person to buy it. It is big, clunky, but it is packed to the fucking brim with sensors and tech…

 P.S. This new scrolling site SUCKS DONKEY BALLS.

Musk decided to boost all the paid bluechecks to the top of the replies so now a bunch of really dumb insignificant chuds are having their moronic opinions forced onto everyone who makes the mistake of scrolling down.

So every editorial about one specific subject has to reflect all other possible subjects and opinions on that subject?

no shit sherlock, it is not a secret and is mentioned in the article as well. 

Perhaps I missed something. How did he even figure it out the testimonies were fake?

Keeping in mind that Paxton is, presumably, the only current criminal who’s also a state AG in the US, and that he’s managed to keep out of court for so long despite being under indictment, they probably figured that it was safer to settle - and I’m guessing make a big deposit in an off shore account for him.

Can’t have corporations making false and misleading statements in Texas. That’s the GOP’s job!

And nothing of value was lost

Counterpoint:

https://gizmodo.com/twitter-outage-welcome-to-twitter-message-1850171981

1. I wasn’t given exact specs, but I would say upward of 40 inches, maybe closer to 50? The slit in front of the image kind of obscures the side.

2. They were very tight lipped. I would guess somewhere upward of $5,000. For context, similar Cisco Telepresence kits sell for $30,000+.

Two questions;

Not so great for Stack Overflow’s traffic numbers, but that sounds good for anyone using the site. Less clutter from repetitive, simple questions = easier time finding answers to more complex stuff and getting feedback.

So my team has been using ChatGPT since 3.0 was released for reference. It is a good starting point for an experienced programmer who can sort through the code. Sometimes the code is spot on but other times - just no. Stack Overflow is similar in that regard but the thing is other people can call out bad code/practice…

Add me to the list of people who hits ChatGPT first.

ChatGPT is just a superior way to get code help for 90% of the most common requests. The responses are faster, the tone is always courteous, you can continue to ask follow-up questions indefinitely, and if the outputs aren’t quite right you can just refer back to official documentation to make corrections.

I’m one of the people who started using ChatGPT more and more. I still find StackOverflow useful from time to time so I haven’t abandoned it. I find their gatekeeping on what constitutes questions “worthy” of discussion a bit frustrating.

Didn’t Stack Overflow ban ChatGPT-generated answers a while back to avoid it contaminating the site? I guess when push came to shove, the coders decided that if they couldn’t use it on the site, they’d just leave the site instead.