I think you misunderstood my answer, I was agreeing that she was a good driver, and had every reason to be racing, as opposed to those who thought she got a drive just because she was a woman.

I think you should spend an enormous amount of money to find out, even though you won’t like the answer.

You forgot Ram Charger.

Agree with the onboard adjustability “tools” being pretty lame, based on some of the drivers comments during the race.

The press loved her because they considered her honest and thoughtful in her dealings with them. She was admired by her peers, as well as the older drivers including Mario Andretti.

Like you wouldn’t have been thrilled with being an average driver among the very best at the top of the racing profession? There were certainly other drivers out there who were less “average” than her. But because she is a woman she has to better than all of them? Give me a break.

And since everyone is piling on Danica for her crashes, let’s just say that Sato is notorious for destroying race cars. Fast, yes, but more than capable of flying off the edge of the cliff as well.

This new chassis is so twitchy I don’t understand how everyone didn’t hit the wall. Does anyone else understand why you would return to the lower downforce of the nineties cars when everyone is used to more?

She never would have lasted as long as she did if she hadn’t been, contrary to the morons here implying reverse sexism.

There were plenty of drivers that crashed today besides her. Still, I am not sure it was the most sound decision to return to Indy for her last race, given her absence from open wheel racing, especially in light of a new platform this year that seemed to give plenty of other drivers problems.

I was ok with this car looking like a cross between a Ford GT and an Evora. But the rear view is the product of a very bad design student who has not had enough sex lately, or has had too much.

That is still quite a leap of imagination to think they equated “soulful sportiness” with a 4 door Miata. And your straw man argument that shoppers in this segment would rather buy a used ATS or BMW is just sheer Jalop fantasy.

For sure, they aren’t Recaro’s, and I much prefer the seats in my BRZ, but they are pretty decent for the “cheaper” Subaru”. I am actually more impressed with the ride quality and lack of noise in the cabin of the Premium and Limited Crosstrek models. Pretty impressive for an inexpensive ute.

If nobody expected a Mercedes or a BMW to be on this list they either have never owned one, or looked in the Consumer Reports reliability indexes for the past fifteen years.

We had power seats in my wife’s Forester. I traded it in on a new Crosstrek Premium last week with manual adjustment only, but the seats are lower and infinitely more comfortable in the Crosstrek than the “chairs” in the Forester, even if it was the top of the line Touring model, with leather.

As long as the seat is fully adjustable up and down, forwards/backwards and reclining, I would much rather they put the money into the seat itself, for the very reason you mentioned. I have the seat bottom as low as it will go in my BRZ, an adjustment most people completely neglect, electric or otherwise. If you can’t…

He is too young to remember.

Your Grand Wagoneer was Jeeps top of the line Luxo-barge, of course it was going to have electrically operated everything. Whether any of that is still working is the real question.

If you wanted a high performance car, you should be a lot more concerned about the quality of the seats themselves, not whether they are infinitely adjustable. And, since you decided to take a dig at the BRZ with that picture, I can tell you it takes less than ten seconds to put the seat back to position in mine after…

Just curious if your commitment problems involve more than just cars...