You could be unsure as to whether you are concerned or not. You could require more detail to come to a decision. “I don’t know” is a valid answer.

“This was a daft move, not a crime.”

We all know how Gizmodo, AKA Univision feels about it: Hillary can do no wrong.

Because if they offer 32 gigs now, they won’t have anything to offer you in two years when you’re complaining about there not being a refresh.

So basically you want a super thin, super light laptop with lots of battery power and a detachable screen which is a tablet but you want a big, power hungry GPU in it?

“so no you don’t have to use it but it could be considered a waste of energy to even offer it”

“In adding the touch bar, Apple isn’t admitting you need a touch screen and a stylus, they are admitting you definitely don’t need those things.”

Right, they just want to vomit up a false dichotomy so they can try and have an argument.

“How?”

“touch screen laptops are tacky”

“the sales are tiny”

“Maybe it’s just me but how is it comfortable to have they keyboard on the back when it’s in tablet mode?”

“Having a small adaptive touch display on the horizontal surface of a laptop has very different usage scenarios than a large vertical touch display.”

No one even uses the touchscreens! touchscreens are literally useless

“This brings touchscreen controls to the existing OS in a way that adds functionality without taking any away.”

“then I’m actually simplifying to plugging in one thing rather than 3 every morning.”

Vine was a lame attempt to monetize a fire hose of vacuous junk content meant to be a way for the attention deficient to waste time, nothing more. It wasn’t good, even for what tried to be.

Hopefully Medium is next.

Huh? Just because you have a touch screen doesn’t mean you can ONLY use the touch screen and have to use it for everything. It’s like saying, “I really hated using regular laptops with just the keyboard.” - Who says you have to?

“No. Why would you need such a thing on a laptop?”