Homoerogenized.
Homoerogenized.
Organic, free-range, fair trade porn.
I’m genuinely curious: what will it take to get us to literally fight Trump and his goons? I’m talking Russia 1917/France 1789 here. Protests aren’t getting the job done. Mueller isn’t getting the job done (yet, though even if he does try to take Trump down we all know the Republicans will never allow it). Democratic…
Dammit, I even went to the website to make sure the company wasn’t Japanese. Clearly I didn’t research it thoroughly enough :-/
Of course, they are both appropriating an aspect of Japanese culture to sell their crap, so they can pretty much both go F themselves.
I had been a fan of Tina for years, but she’s definitely someone who has embraced her white privilege. I think she’s a good person; but once someone reaches a certain level of success, I think something happens to their brains that fucks with their empathy. Maybe the money, or maybe the fame. Probably both.
I figured that was a given though.
“Tay is a self-proclaimed rapper” — I mean, there’s your answer right there.
“Rudy Giuliani doesn’t believe the report but took the time to say: “They’re acting like storm troopers—give me a break, baby!”
Vote in November. For fucks’ sake, vote in November. Hold your nose, and vote for the lesser evils.
I guess he was really chafeeing from not being in the national spotlight.
I can imagine ;-)
Well, Maher is very much a relic himself. Still, that’s pretty apt.
And vice versa.
It makes perfect sense that Roseanne loves Trump. They are both pathetic relics of the Eighties trying desperately to stay relevant in a world that very much wants to forget them, and not caring who they hurt in the process.
At least this time a woman has the power to veto it or not. Men having any say regarding this topic is fucking ridiculous.
Faux News says Donald should get a Nobel Peace Prize because of the Koreas.
I have nothing against Dreyfus; in fact, he’s in one of my favorite movies. That said, I’m with you. He’s not ugly by any means, but handsome isn’t the first word that comes to mind. I guess “plain-looking” would be the term I’d use.
Under equitable conditions, I’d totally support rules requiring people to at least look for work on a regular basis to get benefits. The problem is that the system is so racist and corrupt that those rules constantly punish people of color, the disabled, LGBTQ+ communities, and people replaced by automation or…