She is such a fucking witch and I hope one day when she is asking these rude as fuck questions on her show, someone turns the tables and asks her if she regrets stirring up a moral panic in America and parroting racist bullshit for profit on Fox News for years. I would kill to see her face as her audience applauded…

Sexism, and especially, and over-focus by the media, as was the case throughout the campaign, on Hillary’s detractors. They picked their narrative early and ran with it, and nothing, not even getting the least qualified human on the face of the planet elected President, would deter them.

I think we need to accept that Megyn Kelly is Megyn Kelly and always will be Megyn Kelly. Was there a subversive pleasure in watching her get her wires crossed and inadvertently making a feminist point on Faux News? Yes. That doesn’t mean that there is hope or redemption for her though. It just means that even a…

Not a Hill fan* but Christ almighty she was referring to actual nazis! Why was this statement controversial in the least????

my only criticism of Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” remark is that she said only half of Trump supporters could be put into the basket of deplorables. She was being kind.

There’s some high WASP shade here.

Question of the day: Why do people give such shit to Hillary saying it was a “MASSIVE MISTAKE” to refer to racists and sexist pieces of shits as a “basket of deplorables”

Question of the day: Why do people give such shit to Hillary saying it was a “MASSIVE MISTAKE” to refer to racists and sexist pieces of shits as a “basket of deplorables” but Trump can call Kim Jon-un short and fat etc and all the other insane shit he says but since he says so much of it people don’t even care?…

Clinton and Trump are both being graded on a curve. Trump gets plaudits whenever he manages to deliver a scripted speech to Congress without insulting anyone or throwing a temper tantrum (“omg is this a pivot?? Soooo presidential!”)

I can’t wrap my head around why “deplorables” was such a bad thing to say. I mean, if Trump hadn’t said anything negative about people, I could see why name calling would be called out as mean.

As a successful litigation attorney, Megyn Kelly would have to know that the first, second and third thing you think about in any direct or cross-examination is relevance. If it’s not relevant, it’s not coming in.

Bobby Finger remembered the good old days of Megyn Kelly Today

Joe & Megyn should check their facts. Hillary Clinton did go to those states. And she had a clear message. She states her campaign’s data showed that they were covered in Wisconsin, but if she found out they weren’t she would have been there more.

Megyn Kelly’s true self peaked out underneath all that new branding.

It’s not like the Democrats are without sin.

As a counterpoint, one of the first cases students read about in a book widely used to teach legal reasoning is about a man pulling a woman off a ladder with so much force he ripped tendons in her arm.

Shit.

• Megyn Kelly said, “Well I know you’re the mother of two children. What message do you think you’re communicating to them?”

In googling “Whit Jesus Flipping Tables” I got this gem

Yeah, she ran almost exclusively on the issue of local traffic, and Bob WhateverthatdicksnameisIrefusetowastetimelookingitup ran on “OMG but she’s actually a MAN.” Her district is generally conservative, but it’s also a generally middle class, educated electorate, so when given the choice between a candidate who maybe…