the dark green deep plunge? oooohh my god give it to me
the dark green deep plunge? oooohh my god give it to me
Maybe he should have just sent the last tweet?
That’s essentially what the upcoming Supreme Court case is about! SCOTUS is going to have to make some decisions about what undue burden really means.
I’ve always thought “we’re all Africans” and “colourblind” phrases were ways that people who are out of touch (like, say, my parents) express their pro-SJ feelings, since they lack the modern SJ vocabulary to explain it less awkwardly. Well intentioned, but clumsy by today’s standards.
Okay, this I understand. Thanks for explaining it so well.
what if... that were the obvious point of this essay
Nickelback is not too powerful to overcome. Try harder.
I don’t know why you think I am disagreeing. I already said it was a crime. It was a victimless crime. I’m somewhat uncomfortable with the idea of a victimless crime, because I am always uncomfortable about forcing someone into the role of “victim” when they very clearly are not. I can acknowledge being uncomfortable…
She can think it was a positive experience while society as a whole can condemn it. That’s why there are laws, which apply to everyone - because of social norms/mores. Not fucking children should NOT be this controversial!
I’m in the midst of completeing a doctorate (full funding, federal scholarships, all of the things.) and the same applies. I talk about this with colleagues (profs - even full profs!, postdocs, fellow grad students) and no matter how excellent our scholarship, men of all stripes (regardless of level of education or…
I agree, he did something wrong (especially according to current norms - norms obviously and fortunately evolve).
Yeah, I think that’s incredibly important. The tendency toward telling women “I know you think you want this, and you’re doing it of your own free will, but you’re wrong,” is the kind of simplistic and autonomy-denying perspective that turns people off of feminism. It’s a sort of missing the feminist forest for the…
idk. statuary rape is a strict liability crime for a reason. intent doesnt matter. ugh this is such a weird, murky area. because you are def right that her word should count for something. but we as a society dont want adults having sex with young teenagers, regardless of how the teenagers feel about it
Her word should count for quite a bit when discussing her own situation, much less so when discussing policy or societal norms.
“...you can understand how Lori Maddox could have possibly developed not just a sincere desire to fuck adult men but the channels to do it basically in public; why an entire scene encouraged her, photographed her, gave her drugs that made all of it feel better, loved her for it, celebrated her for it, for years. You…
Just the other day, I was thinking about Nell Carter and how she was taken from us way too soon.
Same! But won’t it be a conflict of interest when President Michelle Obama appoints him in 2025?
As a person who's seen like a triple digit number of cocks, I'm gonna go with real.
After listening to the Season 1 follow ups this week, I kinda feel like this woman, Asia McClain, is the perfect witness, completely unflappable, and not biased in one way or the other.
The man just got his ass kicked by Denver’s defense in the most important game of his life. I don’t blame him for being a sore loser.