Actually, I think Straw Hat is right

Exactly; people have different thresholds. This is something that Straw Hat does not understand, as evidenced by their comments such as “You were also outside with the rest of your clothes. Do you change your pants and shirt that you were wearing outside before lying on a bedspread or couch?”. There’s no…

I get that there is a physical difference and that if you happen to step through stuff that will easily track in, it will cause a difference.

No, it is clear that you literally do not understand the difference between wearing shoes from outdoors while inside and wearing other clothes from outdoors while inside - even after having it explained to you.

So, you don’t understand. Which is why I explained it to you.

Where did you get the idea that I don’t understand it?

Well you acknowledge that it is there, so I’m not sure why you are arguing against the point. And the amount would be on a case-by case basis*. Also, it is not unusual that someone might have something on the sole of their shoe that they are not aware of.

The issue is that particulate matter is carried indoors on shoes. That is why we have doormats - and even when using them, they don’t necessarily remove all of the particulate matter that will otherwise end up being tracked around the floor / carpet, making it dirtier than indoor-only slippers or socks. Also, when you…

But even in the context of the story, the meaning is different. Putting a necklace around a neck is symbolically different than putting a ring on a finger, even in this story.

Putting it on her body, which he is not in charge of, has cultural meaning, even if Space Moth as an individual is so separate from cultural influences that s/he doesn’t understand it.

So you know that placing a ring on the left ring finger has drastically different significance than placing it on a chain around the neck?

Oh, and I also never commented on the “normality” of placing jewelry on the deceased - I said that it is a common practice.

She, the living person, no longer exists.

You said “Open casket burials aren’t a thing in the UK.” I never said anything about “open casket burials”.

...ok, and...?

They could have discussed it, as many couples do. And you HAVE to be joking about her parents accepting a proposal on her behalf; she’s dead, and they aren’t engaged. She literally no longer exists. Your argument is absolutely ridiculous.

We have zero idea if this girl would have said yes to this proposal.

You really are not understanding any of this - despite the fact that I have already explained it. Twice.

No, it is not. She did not alert the world to what the nazis were doing (and then was subsequently blamed for their actions as a result) - she helped them with their efforts, and possibly kept quiet about what she knew they were doing. That is what “complicity” means.

No, it’s not. That saying refers to holding the bearer of bad news as being responsible for the bad news. That is not what is going on here.