Ah, resorting to name-calling now, eh? That's mature.
UNHIVED
unhived
...says the person who keeps coming back with false claims and accusations in an attempt to save face...
If you're going to do a show specifically about addiction, you have a responsibility to show it honestly.
Yeah, anyone who claims / expects that a fictional television show has a responsibility to present an honest representation of anything is being foolish and unrealistic.
Ah, yes; when you know you've lost the argument, you can always ignore the points and just reply with a gif claiming boredom, right?
Certainly not I, as I don't claim that it (or its writers) "have a responsibility to show (the effects of addiction) honestly" - I take it at face value for what it is; a fictional comedy / drama about someone who is an addict. You are clearly the one who takes it (and yourself) way too seriously if you think the…
Exactly; you are criticizing it for not realistically representing addiction (and the feelings of the addict) and claiming that it has a "responsibility to show (that) honestly"; i.e., you are criticizing it for failing in your (unrealistic) requirements of it.
Yes, but he qualifies that opinion with the points following (that her life is a downward spiral as a result of being an addict). Additionally, RedFlaminjune also said, "If you're going to do a show specifically about addiction, you have a responsibility to show it honestly." - This is completely inaccurate and…
That a show does not meet your unreasonable expectations is not a failure of the show or its writers - it just means you have unreasonable expectations of a show that is not about addiction in and of itself, and does not make any claims to be a truthful representation of how addiction internally effects the addict -…
It is not a show about addiction. It is a show about a character who is an addict. There is a difference. It is also fictional. Are you unfamiliar with the concept of "suspension of disbelief"? If you want to watch a show about addiction in which the (purported) intent is to be "representative of addiction", watch…
I think this show is a terrible representation of addiction [...] It's entertaining but not representative of addiction.
The reason it has such a following is that it is a ridiculous, terrible movie. So, no; as a movie, it is not “good”. But if you enjoy ridiculous costumes, catchy “rock”-ish showtunes, terrible movies, and yelling / throwing stuff in a movie theater, then it is a good time.
Along with all the other suggestions you’re getting, I’d add this; clean as you go. Meaning, when you’re done with a measuring cup / spoon / mixing bowl, etc, wash it (or put it in the dishwasher) and put the spice jars, btotes of oil, aND other ingredient containers, etc., away. You tend to have numerous tiny…
Dude, I don’t need an “out” (least of all from you), as I have said nothing wrong, hypocritical, inaccurate, or anything that would qualify me as being an “ass” (I even offered you a suggestion on how to avoid supporting things you are opposed to or critical of) - though you clearly have, and continue to do so. You…
As you are still channeling more money into Gawker media.
No, I am simply pointing out simple, observable fact. I am not criticizing anything that I, myself, am supporting or contributing to. You, on the other hand, are doing exactly that. It’s not that anyone is criticizing what they choose to click on, it’s that you are criticizing the monetization of this 911 recording,…
The difference is I am not criticizing (by calling it “sick”) that which I am directly contributing to (and supporting / participating in), which is what you are doing. By your own argument, what you are doing by clicking on the article at all is “sick”.
And your clicking on the article is what is (contributing to) bringing in the revenue here.
They are public record and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy when placing a call to 911, so it is not a breach of privacy. And it’s funny you make this comment on a celebrity gossip site, which exists for the purpose of digging into and exposing information about peoples’ - especially celebrities’ -…
Lip Sync Battle should not be a “thing”, at all.