No, it’s not (anymore, at least):

The “Alex” article is about the phenomenon that occurred with the posting of the photo - there is nothing creepy about that article itself, and the posting of the photo in question within that context (and from what I recall from another source, Alex gave verbal consent to having the photo taken).

You are so incredibly dense it is literally beyond belief.

See above, moron.

LOL. You realize the comment you are replying to is supported by law (for good reason), no?

Statistics have nothing to do with this issue.

You're basing your whole argument on whether or not a person looks healthy.

But there's no guarantee that any airplane passenger is truthful about their health.

So it's up to you to decide how the airline responds? Not to mention, it is stated in the article(s) (and the headline of this one) that she did not have proper documentation, so I'm not really sure what you are trying to say.

Except that an email (especially one lacking in the proper terminology required) isn't sufficient documentation for an airline that has the legal right to refuse passage in these types of situations. "If you feel fine you should be able to fly" doesn't exactly mean "You are capable of assessing your own medical…

If I was diagnosed with cancer, no - I would not have the ability to assess my current condition as I am not a doctor or oncologist (same with the woman in this story). Luckily, I don't have any current medical conditions that put me at any additional risk when flying, so that question is irrelevant for me.

Well, no, she failed to provide the proper documentation stating she is clear to fly. And given the frequency of flight delays and cancellations, the woman was stupid to schedule her return flight for the day before her treatments anyway.

Why?

This isn't any different from telling a passenger in a wheelchair that they weren't capable of flying.

Lara Flynn Boyle is not anywhere in that video.

The Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, Eraserhead. Eraserhead is the earliest of the three, but least "accessible" for the viewer, so you might want to warm up a bit with the other two first.

Give Noah a chance to fuck up in real life.

The point I was making to the OP / yeahbutt666 was in regards to their claim that the situation discussed in the article above is an example of a "chain reaction" effect of the "precedent" set by the Blurred Lines case of copyrighting a "sound and feel" of a song - which it is not, since the argument in the situation…

I wasn’t making a point about consent, or whether there wold be any (legal) consent to give or withhold in this case.

It is utterly indefensible on jezebel’s part that they posted this. I’m guessing the fact that the exhibit was done in collaboration with two female gallery owners makes them think it’s perfectly ok. Perhaps Tracey Moore thinks it’s “empowering” for Margret to have strangers publish her private photos and detailed…