It’s hard to argue with your insightful comment, but I’ll give it a shot. First, you’re wrong about every assumption you made about me. Like, literally everything, which is kind of impressive because even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while. But not you. Second, I never said that I had an issue with…

I can agree with basically all of that (long but well thought-out) comment, i.e., that maybe there is some criticism to levy against Lynch for not being willing (or perhaps able) to deal with the issue. My only point, which was in response to the original post, was that the failure to support Bennett’s (or Kap’s)…

All fair points. They really didn’t stand back in 2009? I don’t remember that. But then, I also don’t remember what I had for lunch today, so I guess that’s not surprising.

That’s awesome! High five, dude. Thanks for the laugh.

I read the first half of your comment as satire because it’s so over-the-top, but the second half made me not so sure. If you’re trying to make a real point, avoid the name calling and the use of all caps; it’s hard to take you seriously when you do. In any event, I’ve tried to make objective, non-snarky points in…

I feel like you’re responding to a point that I didn’t make. I never said Kap had a more effective or far-reaching platform than on live TV at a game. I just said that there’s a time and place for everything, and some people (not including me; see my first comment) have taken issue with the method and manner in…

They’re wearing me down, dude!

Another, and in my mind equally plausible, explanation for Lynch’s statement is that he’s a guy who’s trying to run a football team, and regardless of which side of this issue he falls on, he doesn’t want to have to deal with it in his own locker room because, as an emotionally charged issue, it can be disruptive to…

Appreciate the more measured response than I’ve received from others here.

What about my comment makes you think I’m advocating any one position or acting as an unwitting “stumbling block,” as opposed to offering a possible explanation for the actions of others, specifically John Lynch in this case?

First, the “You’re either with us, or against us” approach is a cheap rhetorical technique. Bush certainly took flak for it. Hell, there’s even a Wikipedia page describing its flaws.

I’ll preface my comment by saying I support peace and equality, and personally don’t care much if an athlete decides to sit for the National Anthem.

Your argument starts with the false premise that Trump would ever set an Italian-leather-clad loafer in a combine harvester. Only losers drive harvesters, and Trump wants you to know he’s definitely that.

Seeing the Cards 6' tall mascot for the first time might cost Rally Cat a few of those 9 lives.

Tough break for the doctors.

That’s fine as long as he didn’t sit while Dixie was playing before the match.

Bettis made history by pitching the entire night with just one ball.

[Announces a safety can cover the field and make picks]

Good call. That’s the word I couldn’t remember.

Does this mean the first round of herbal tea is on dad?