Can I take a moment to just express how little I care about anything that's going on with the angels right now? Because I care very little about that whole subplot.
Can I take a moment to just express how little I care about anything that's going on with the angels right now? Because I care very little about that whole subplot.
My "Intermediate Poetry Workshop" Professor - First creative writing professor or teacher that called me out when I would just bullshit my work. So many of my professors and teachers before and after him would give me consistent top marks almost no matter what sort of material I would turn in. He was the first to hand…
Nothing by Janne Teller and The Book of Everything by Guus Kuijer.
I'm on this site a lot (I think it's number two on my "most visited" list according to Chrome, which—wow), and I enjoy reading through the comments to see what visitors to the site have to say, especially in things like the Open Channel posts.
O'Brien is an engaging presence, with a seemingly limitless capacity for nervy bravery. He's one of the main reasons to watch Teen Wolf, and he does a pretty good job of taking on the Logan Lerman/Josh Hutcherson role of the plucky guy who's out of his depth but making the best of things.
That's probably for the best.
Stargate Infinity.
Romance novels also have action scenes in them and sometimes rich character development
As much as I love seeing Life on Mars on any list, I don't know if really fits. One of the best parts of the pilot is the sudden shift from what, to me at least, felt like a fairly typical cop show to the more vibrant and engaging '70s.
The CW is forever confusing, though. My local newspaper listed in the cable section of its TV listings for years, which confused me as I've never had cable but have been successfully getting it for ages with an antenna. Then they switched it to the network section, and now it's a subchannel. And I don't even try and…
I think it depends on the type and the level of investment I have in a show. On Stargate SG-1, for example, I never really minded if they messed with continuity because, although I loved the show to bits, I was mostly there to have fun and enjoy it for what it was. Same thing for Doctor Who, Teen Wolf, and a few other…
I just want this movie to be good enough so that when I go to see it only because Dylan O'Brien is in it, I only feel slight shame.
I had a friend who for weeks after it was announced would write me long emails about how horrible Hannibal was going to be, how it was going to completely butcher the books, etc.
Karaoke!Dean better not be a good singer. I swear to the not-yet-appearing God of this show, I will not stand for that.
Tumblr is definitely the big place I see it, but I think any group of people talking about a show or book regularly kind of develops its own hive mind that people end up not being able to see out of. There were a few forums on TWoP, for example, that used to just get really, really weird that way too.
2. Confusing "die-hard fans" with "all audiences."
The word "proud" is kind of throwing me off here, but that's mostly because I don't think I would ever really describe a writing choice like that.
Excellent news! Anything from the Life on Mars people is something I'm interested in checking out. But the real questions is, will there be fake time travel?
Yeah, the Master is found of overly complex, not really necessary schemes. Remember that time he turned the entire population of the Earth into copies of himself? Because... because... why did he do that again?
I've been trying to come up with a semi-witty response to this, but I'm too busy being semi-horrified by this information.