The anger in this article is weird. Those guys were asked and said something positive. There was no mansplaining or being sexist involved.

I mean, your bent over. You’re both sweating. The room stinks like sex. You’re in the middle of thinking about someone from the office. Nobody has time to notice a butthole.

When I recommended your post, it took one off your total instead of adding one. Strange.

Most of the arguments against the police are off base.

There’s nothing to suggest White men are any worse than other police. It could’ve just as easily have been the woman who shot the lady. Women and police of color have just as many complaints as White men.

That’s not true for Black Women. 95% of the people killed in police custody are men. Black women are like 2-3%. This was an anomaly.

She pivoted to get a more mainstream job, and it worked. She got into clashes with people at Fox over the past couple of years because she became more moderate instead of just pure reactionary.

Nothing wrong with a good grudge fuck

Didn’t realize it had come out. Thanks!

No kidding. Tina Fey is a HOF’er. Iliza Schlezinger has figured out the beats and how to shape a bit, but she’s not funny in the bones like a Tina Fey, Laurie Kilmartin, Maria Bamford, etc.

It’s a Catch 22. This type of comment is why they don’t want to be around women. They almost always think women are catty and dramatic. And because they prefer to hang around guys, women actually are catty and dramatic about them.

That’s not what she’s criticizing. That was just an example. Her point is that there’s a lack of creativity in female comics. I completely disagree, but it’s a pretty normal complaint from a successful comic. We’re just not used to someone singling out women comedians for criticism since they have to go through so…

It’s probably has a bit more of a petroleum smell than Soros or Unions. Or like a WD40 type of smell in the NRA’s case.

Fair enough. I agree that most conservatives do think their beliefs are genuinely the best way to go.

Maybe. But his shooter also assured that he’ll be seen as a victim and re-elected soon. Like it tends to do, radicalism just made things worse for what it pretends to support.

They usually only discuss procreation, not sex.

None of the new gender identities has a basis in science. They all came from gender studies, which is under the sociology branch. They don’t do any of the peer review, vigorous dissent, careful methodologies, using control groups, or any of what makes science work.

I don’t think you’re allowed to say that. The person, whose pronoun choice I don’t know, doesn’t consider the personself whose pronoun choice I don’t know to be a woman.

Raising kids as gender neutral is very sketchy. Gender neutrality is one type of gender, no different than the rest. I’m sure we agree on that.

Unfortunately, that’s too easy, and I’m guessing they’ll come up with a terrible solution instead. The root is that they don’t care enough.