Actually I think they knew exactly what they were talking about. It was always a bill to look like it was doing something without doing much.
Actually I think they knew exactly what they were talking about. It was always a bill to look like it was doing something without doing much.
That’s not how it works. Litigation is not a single thread processor.
If you’re a parent, do you risk having a meltdown or do you get your child what’s most appealing to them?
It doesn’t need to say it. The result of the package being filled with gas would be that the package can’t easily be compressed which in turn protects the chips. Nobody should have to walk you to that conclusion.
In the case of chips there are reasons for the extra padding.
No, they already told you the real reason. Whether or not you buy the argument is up to you.
Also it’s not like you’re buying a 2 litre bag of chips or something. It’s sold by weight; doesn’t matter how full it is.
Labeled weight is the only thing that really matters, but for the “reduce breakage” part, it’s about inflating the bag so it shields the chips from the outside. Chips bouncing around inside the bag is not the concern. It’s about the contents not being crushed when it’s being shoved into shipping boxes, store shelves,…
Am I crazy that I actually check the product weight (as printed...I don’t actually weigh it out myself) when looking at products to buy? I already know that they play packaging tricks to fool you into buying one product over the others, and thought this was common knowledge. The package size absolutely isn’t a direct…
Plaintiff Jeffrey Kpakpoe-Awei “alleged Storck USA LP fills the 2.75-ounce bags of caramels with unnecessary empty space that misrepresents the amount of chews that are actually in the container.” He claims to have purchased a bag of the sugar-free caramels in December that was less than 40 percent full.
“Well-meaning”??? I’ll grant you the root of their CAUSE is laudable, but literally nothing they do is well-meaning. They shame, bully, and threaten people who don’t get right in line with their agenda, and when that fails, they launch horrifically stupid PR campaigns. I’m trying to eat more veggies and less meat, but…
Nope, you’re a thief. Those bottles are communal for customers eating in. It would be like taking the salt and pepper shakers or ketchup bottle from another restaurant.
The proper procedure for making a burger out of a melon:
Our store has had no brief of caffeine drink sales to minors.
I could have sworn I read on some news article that she was reassigned due to personal reasons. That’s what NASA said. I mean I don’t want to be quick to jump to racism just because shes Black, but if she was reassigned due to personal reasons that would explain her being so silent about this whole thing.
Jesus. Nobody is forcing you to spend money on anything. The only people that loot boxes etc... ‘prey’ on are those who are incapable of delaying their own gratification. Here’s a suggestion for those who feel like they are being victimized by optional, often completely cosmetic microtransactions. It’s going to really…
Putting “RIP” at the end of your disrespectful comment doesn’t make you less of a shitbird, just fyi.
Oh fuck off. You get in someone else’s supercar, you hit the gas, the tires aren’t “performing at the level they should be”? If you decide to double the speed limit on a public street in a vehicle that you are not personally 100% certain of, it’s on you, bro.
I’ll admit, you’re growing on me. Now just get Kotaku to stop using that god awful video player.
inb4 the takedown and the hundred corporate shills defending it