Redacted due to shame.

The Walking Dead has demonstrated our liking of post apocalyptic stories, you could have all sorts of atolls and floating settlements out there. Maybe even defend the dry land that they found so as to save money on the budget. Besides, Turn already showed you can CGI boats onto water completely believably for cheap.

It's an unnecessary retread of another story that was already told, and why? It's not going to appeal to Trek fans, it doesn't win you mass market appeal, because who watches Trek movies outside of Trek fans anymore, and the first was already successful. Why are the super-soldiers inside of torpedoes? Why does the…

I've thought this for awhile now, I think Waterworld would make a half-way decent TV show. Feel free to mock me as you wish, but I'll stand by that belief.

God that movie was great.

No! Wrong answer! That movie sucked!

So, once? That film is a masterwork.

Hey, Michael Fassbender at least looks the part. Jake Gyllenhaal is a sad puppy.

Staying true to the Assassin's Creed tradition, the plot will make zero fucking sense.

I just looked up Cole Hauser, I thought he WAS Josh Lucas.

All do respect to Josh Lucas, but he's no Bradley Cooper.

Only for the uninitiated.

I suspect this movie would annoy me because it would treat the people making this music like they're big party goers that just make music sometimes. Despite what a lot of musicians say, that is so rarely the case. Almost all the musicians I've met are artists, they study their craft and are really, really serious…

Look, I told you, find a dorm room, quit your job, break up with your girlfriend, buy a giant bag of pot and play Call of Duty all day. It's a proven method for achieving shooting game prowess. Mix in masturbation no more than twice a day for maximum effect.

I like how the only things that bugged me about this episode weren't even mentioned. Were they supposed to be Eritrean forces? In which case they are a Marxist dictatorship, so that could be kind of interesting. If they are Al Shabab I would be a little annoyed, because Al Shabab is two countries away, and even then…

I really hope this was a satire of the "Inuits have over a thousand words for snow" "fact". Either way I still laughed.

Ah, but at least a quarter of the governing body of Hogwarts was in favor of an ethnically pure wizarding society descended from a handful of medieval English wizarding families. It would make sense if they limited admissions somewhat. Still, I think it's so American we keep slipping into a debate of black people in…

Having few black people in the world of Harry Potter actually makes a lot of sense, as the main conflict was between egalitarians and fascists who wanted to commit genocide against anyone who couldn't trace their bloodline back to a handful of medieval English wizarding families.

Harry Potter didn't just not depict a utopia, it was actually kind of a fucked up society. A sizeable percentage of the population was in favor of an ethnically pure wizarding society and committing genocide against anyone who couldn't trace their bloodline back to a bunch of medieval English wizarding families.

I think that actually adds value personally. It allows the writers to paint this world as insular and stupidly masculine. The people in it think with the balls way more often than with their brains. The one woman in the room is a preening sycophant. I think it was a brilliant move to make, and one that was made with…