If it's actually made as a straight adaptation, nothing about "At the Mountains of Madness" would necessitate going beyond PG-13. The only thing likely to nudge the rating higher would be showing, not inferring, the dissection of the first exploratory party.

Granted, I only saw the first two, but I'd be very surprised if the later films weren't directly working to the template set by the earlier ones. But it's not just the writing that makes these films shit—every time a character design is revealed, there's outcry about it not being "right", and Bay. being the big name…

CBF watching, but my take on Bay's work is that he's usually the scapegoat for the wider blandbuster hollywood machine. He winds up with a terrible script, some awful pre-production work owing more to marketing than any directorial input (gotta sell them toys), plus usually a fair amount of unavoidable stigma just for…

Too lean, doesn't really produce that satisfying of an end result. You end up with a lasagne which is far too firm and dry.

I was reaching for my wallet until I read mustard. Fuck you, potato guy, and your poor choice of salad condiments.

I was mildly interested until Lexi Belle and now just take my money.

All I really have to call truly local is the work of George William Russell, but fuck it, it's more than Portadown has, so up theirs.

Of course it's not versus, it's clearly short for viz., as in "Batman viz. Superman". There is a batman, that is to say, he is a super man. Small wonder your small brains did not detect such magnificent wordplay from the master of all things subtle and underplayed.

Rory Calhoun.

I totally saw footage of dinosaurs and Richard Attenborough side by side once though.

Maybe he's just taking his boulder for a walk.

I bet the Indian rocket is a more relatable actor, too.

One thing I will say, is that the video for that song was devised and directed by a woman, so it's worth noting idiocy does not stem solely from the scrote.

The "calling a spade a spade" comment is totally fine, and I see no reason to apologise for it. Was the man so thin as to be unhealthy? No. So was he promoting being unhealthily thin? Fuck no. Simple.

The cunt comment is totally fine, and I see no reason to apologise for it. Was the man so thin as to be unhealthy? No. So was he promoting being unhealthily thin? Fuck no. Simple.

All those millions must really be tearing him up.

Drugging and raping a child is not "a mistake", and getting away with it scot free is not a disadvantage like you want to paint it. Plenty of people suffer personal tragedies and don't go out and inflict such obscene pain on others in return.

Point one: contraceptive and abortifacient medicines are older than Christ, and he never said jack shit about either.
Point two: I feel it's entirely remiss that we still don't have a movie about the real santorum. I mean I'm sure there are plenty of top-shelf releases but I want something with the full 3D,…

I'm a university-educated european, so I'm pretty sure it's mostly just the hate for child-rapists.

I don't get how, in the whole span of time that's he's enjoyed a millionaire's lifestyle after raping a child, someone has shot John Lennon, killed Dian Fossey, killed Pat Finucane, shot Harvey Milk, killed Olaf Palme, and despite people lining up around the street to murder good guys, this categorically undeniable…