This was known during the primaries. Neither Trump nor Bernie would have been doing so well if such a large portion of the electorate wasn’t dying for change, yet so many people chose to ignore this...
This was known during the primaries. Neither Trump nor Bernie would have been doing so well if such a large portion of the electorate wasn’t dying for change, yet so many people chose to ignore this...
People just don’t fucking like her because of HER. In 2008 nobody was talking about holding their noses and voting for Obama...if you have to do that you have a bad candidate and you might not want to run a bad candidate in a racist/sexist society cause you might lose to something worst.
The DNC needs to be retooled to encourage competition from the bottom up, closer to a farm system, that can build politicians who have the policy and the charisma to impassion the party base.
I’m wondering how many voters who lean Democratic didn’t bother because they didn’t think they really needed to show up or their state was a lock.
But would you be eating pizza while fucking in the pool?
What does it mean to be dignified, and who gets to make that determination?
I don’t think anyone was saying it was shade. It just seems like she’s totally full of herself to compare herself to those people (though I would argue that she’s of far more significance to music and culture at large than Amy Winehouse). But, I mean, she’s not wrong to put herself on the level of those others. She’s…
Yeah, no.
One of these is a privacy issue. The other is not.
More like Oscar’s trash can.
Hello, non sequitur.
No, it is a great example because it demonstrates the slippery slope that people will embark upon when someone decides that censorship is okay.
If you are searching “did the holocaust happen” I’m pretty sure you’re not just gonna get a “yes” from google. And you may be under-educated.
How are people who are genuinely trying to seek information supposed to know what is factually correct? Especially if the incorrect info is at the top?
‘Truth’ is a tricky subject. If the question is, “Should illegal immigrants be deported” the closest thing to objective ‘truth’ is yes. According to current law, these people committed a crime and the specified punishment is deportation. Pretty straight forward. A search query should not advocate disregarding current…
As in much research, it’s up to the individual asking the question to do their due diligence in determining what the “truth” really is.
Despite what you may think or want, Google’s job is not to sort out right from wrong. It’s job is simply to provide information.
Actually, I would say it is kind of a library. It simply contains and supplies information. People need to use critical thinking skills to understand and make use of it, though.
Google is just supposed to find you the information you are looking for, not verify the accuracy or appropriateness of that information.
Then look at the rest of the links after the first one.