My. Won’t this be fun.

Yeah I guess that’s always an option, i never tried it/cared to learn how to do it

Excuse me. I never ate dirt.

Speaking as someone who currently uses an Android phone, I don’t know why anyone would ever want to touch a Samsung Galaxy Garbage over an iPhone 6s.

At a bar, a woman tugged hers out of her purse just to show me we had the same one. “Nobody has this color!” she squealed.

I joined Verizon in 2005.

Actually, I don’t use a lot of mobile data. I’m on WiFi a lot, and my 2GB plan is super cheap compared to the current options because there’s no line access fee and it includes a subsidized phone. Even if I go over my allotment, my overage fee is only $10/GB.

Yep—and that’s what I’m doing. On the new plans, my two-year cost goes up $400+ dollars.

If 2GB of data is all she needs per month, then it’s probably cheaper for her to stay with Verizon and renew that contract. That’s what I’m doing.

I’m renewing my Verizon contract. It’s way cheaper over two years than it is for me to go to T-Mobile.

For me, it worked on a case, but it didn’t work on a screen protector.

For me, it worked on a case, but it didn’t work on a screen protector.

Of course, Motorola finally does good with a camera at the same time I’m planning on moving to an iPhone...

Yes, though I’m not sure that would actually be possible to do.

Exactly how is this a money grab when T-Mobile is downgrading abusive users’ plans to the least expensive offering?

They specifically say that the unlimited data is only for phone use and tethering is restricted to 7GB.

It seems that you think you should be entitled to do as much as you want online on your PC (and phone and tablet) whenever you want so long as you are paying for some sort of Internet connection. Clearly that is not the case. You’ll just have to learn to manage your usage better or upgrade your service.

You don’t fucking need 2-fucking-TB of fucking data on a fucking cellular fucking connect-fucking-tion.

I have never thought the VMAs are anywhere near the Grammys. Rather than highlighting artistic merit, I’ve always thought they were an excuse for MTV to backpat themselves and pop music artists. The VMAs are as legit to reward shows like the Oscars, Tonys, Grammys, and Emmys as reality TV is to scripted drama series.

I don’t think they look itchy. I just think they look like cheap shoes that will fall apart after being worn for a while—and I’m sure that’s exactly what will happen to them.

But I don’t understand why they don’t just give him the shoes now. Why is it conditional? And it’s just a pair of shoes. Why is a pair of insanely rich people giving a sick man a pair of expensive shoes something so incredily awesome I should now think they are great people?