Human rights. And the right to decency. And rightness itself. And above all else: right instead of wrong.

but there is the curve... if enough votes are captured, your vote value would drop to zero.

Umm, am I high or are these two statements a bit contradictory?

It would complete the transformation of the Democrats into the Republican party circa ‘08-’16, yes.

The position the neo-liberals at MSNBC argue for, I would guess.

They successfully blocked a sitting president from filling a vacant supreme court seat. That’s major, that’s long term, and that’s really stretching the outer bounds of what is possible for a party that didn’t even have 60 senate seats. Would that we had representatives so rabid on our side, but in pursuit of…

Uh, the tea party absolutely succeeded in getting many of its preferred policies implemented

The Tea Party absolutely successfully took over their targetted party. That shit works.

NNNNNGH BUT PURITY TESTS!! BERNIE BROS!! AMERICANS HATES THE LEFT!!

That is what the article argues for, yes.

Pictured: Democrats attacking

You’re right. It’s a $40,000 branded product.

Um...Econ 101 doesn’t really cover the complexity of real world situations.

u mad?

They mean litre. Which gets you a far less fun $3.9312 per US gallon.

Why would high prices lead to more disorder than empty shelves?

Actually no Ayn Rand there IS such a thing as price gouging when the commodity is considered an essential utility. You know, like maybe gas when your shitty citizens vote in shitty elected officials who don’t build public transit infrastructure.

There’s a reason there’s a law against price gouging. People who desperately need staple goods in short supply exist, and if you let gas prices hit 9.99 a gallon, and bread to hit 15 a loaf, people would get desperate and desperate people do dangerous things. The law exists to keep society civil in times of disaster,…

To late I’m already here.

For me personally my purchase does, and always will, depend on the quality of the product once released.