ulissyslima2
ulissyslima2
ulissyslima2

It gets complicated when the rights of demonstrators aren’t respected and nothing happens to solve that outside of saying “don’t fucking hurt each other while I try to gain the presidency and don’t hold your breath after I win it”

who forced you?

lul wut?

What an intelligent, well written and argued point you have!
/s /s /s /s /s

I see what you are doing, encouraging everyone ELSE to play Bastion....

I’ll take a look at the link tonight.

I don’t see the connection between wanting office too much+picking one dimensional judges and the argument that a single partisan government is bad. I AM NOT SAYING A SINGLE PARTISAN GOVERNMENT IS GOOD. It is not, for the reasons you cited, I just don’t see the relation to what we

hmm I wouldn’t know, haven’t read anything from Buzzfeed. The headlines and the people on my facebook who share them are enough for me.

Wanting too much is an interesting criteria for eliminating a candidate. Who do you think wants it just enough but not too much?
I also don’t understand how possible single dimensional pick is better than any pick Pence or Trump would choose, could you explain?

Might I suggest a scale of 1-10 for credible reporting sources!?

1-???
10-Wordpress blogs

I mean, as long as they arent being treated as interns

Nah nah, my scale is very vague and open ended, it requires a lot of Truthyness.

To me Hillary is a 5 or 6, the average level of cheating/ not doing the right thing and really the minimum required to be a presidential nominee. I would have to sit down and actually read the emails, but lets say she ties Trump. Trump is

MY ONLY CRIME IS BEING BORED AT WORK

Nixon worse than Reagonomics? Or Andrew Jackson’s “indian removal” policy? To my knowledge Nixon did not knowingly start a unjustified war for personal profit AND simultaneously cause a global financial crisis that fucks everyone up on a global scale so much that nationalistic/rightwing/xenophobic politics start to

Well that says a lot. Your scale is pretty shitty sir. To lump the Kochs and Trump together speaks of an ignorance that has no say in creating scales in internet comment sections. Just on who has spent more money to do horrible things, the Koch’s win 10/10 easy over Trump, an easy jump in the scale, completely unfair

What happens after 7 years of Nope ?

Nah, reselling would be a 2 at most. Unless you get other people to resell them and pay them shit, then you are just between 3 and 4. 4, to me, starts to involve public funds meant for the collective good being used for personal gain. 5 is Nixon. 10 is anyone who knew the reasons to go for the iraq war were bullshit,

So you think Pence is a better option for all americans than Clinton?

Elaborate please!

No, no, a three would have to be both depriving and personally gaining something from their participation in capitalism. For example, 1 is buying an iphone, 3 is owning a small chain of stores that sells iphones.

Seriously? What is the average level then? It’s not like Nixon knowingly started a war under false pretenses for the personal gain AND simultaneously threw the world economy in the shitter, fostering a rented global trend of higher right wing nationalistic parties.
Where does Nixon(and Trump for that matter) compare