The way MSNBC pundits seemed upset and nauseated that the red wave wasn’t happening confirms this.

Next thing you know “Prima Nocta” will start getting the side-eye on Twitter.

ONLY if Tulsi Gabbard runs for President will I consider voting. Otherwise I will stay home and provide childcare for my daughter.

The people that are scared of losing “their Texas” can take the state out of the US and live any damn way they want. Just let the liberals and progressives and other people out of the state first.

Oregon had a similar measure on the ballot (Oregon Measure 112) and while the amendment to ban slavery did pass, it did so by a shockingly* low 55-45 margin.

I’d presume the original idea was both to provide training and distraction for inmates while offsetting some of the costs of incarceration by selling the products of their labor with them receiving compensation from the remainder.

so now the woke mob is trying to cancel slavery smdh

Lotta people seeing Warden Norton from Shawshank Redemption as a groundbreaking entrepreneur around here...

Exactly, it’s legalized slavery.

You presume this program was designed with the inmates in mind. It was designed as a way for a government contractor to make billions while exploiting the inmate population for free labor. The “training and distraction for inmates” is just the PR they attached to their scheme so they can get away with it without being…

Your story on this site is ever evolving. It's interesting how ever single problem that afflicts a single person in the nation is a problem you personally have. It's almost as if you're not actually who you say you are. 

There is no liberal media bias. The media bias is firmly to the right. They are allowed to control the narrative. I did not believe the “red wave” predictions. Anxiety about the economy has always been present and will always be the leading issue in polls whether the GOP or Dems are in power. This was the first time…

We need an amendment to the 13th removing slavery and indentured servitude as punishments.

How can it be true that American voters don’t pay attention to anything that doesn’t deliver results immediately and also that Americans primarily pay attention to big ticket items that don’t deliver results immediately? It’s pretty obviously mutually exclusive to say that American voters have such short attention…

No, your argument is incoherent, because on the one hand you are saying voters really care about and respond to long-term projects that take time to implement, while at the same time saying that voters are ignoring those very same projects because they have Goldfish Bowl syndrome.

No, your shitty, incoherent argument.

I guess you decide what the fuck your argument is, because this is getting annoying and old. Is it that American voters really care deeply about projects that will pay off in the long term, enough that they will ignore the short-term problems they have that are not being addressed? Or do they just care about short…

But those things really aren’t the meaty legislative victories that voters care about or really make meaningful changes to a majority of American’s. 

I guess we’ll see but frankly I have no faith that voters will make the right decision. They care a LOT about the economy right now and, at the same time, have mostly bought the lie that Republicans are somehow better at handling the economy... even though historical data says the complete opposite.