They did do opposition research on him and knew that at least some of his biography didn’t add up but they couldn’t get anyone report on it. “It’s two openly gay men running against each other in Long Island, how about that?” was the only thing anybody was writing about the race.

Fled Europe around WWII to Brazil.

But government does have real control over it; Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, and Nixon all exercised some form of price controls over certain goods and services, gas and oil among them, as a way of dealing with demand spikes and profiteering. While the economic consensus is adamantly against their use in the United…

Fair, I should have clarified that the couple of nickels would be what actually gets to GED Palin from the dollars donated to Trump’s PAC “on her behalf”.

I took it to be Boebert complaining about being portrayed as “aligned” with MTG in the sense of “in agreement/cooperation with”, when she claims she’s not.

There is no such thing as a right leaning independent anymore. If you ask any of them who identify that way, they'll parrot MAGA talking points but insist they're independent. 

You guys, I’m not sure cause I wasn’t there but I really don’t think Trump "donated to Lauren Boebert" 🤫

Story needs to be updated, drastically, to point out that the Dems knew all of this before the election ... and completely fumbled the ball.

The problem is this guy represents Queens and Long Island. The NYT only wants “undecided” voters in diners and trunk stops in swing states to talk coded racism for Pulitzer bait.

Sure, but does he FEEL like he should have worked there? If so it’s the same thing as if he had.

This is the same party that almost got Herschel Walker into the Senate. They don’t care. 

It sure would have been nice if voters knew this information before the November 8 election. I’m not sure if Democrats were so certain they’d win the race that they didn’t do opposition research or what

Because the endgame is forcing women who get caught in the middle of a medication abortion to undergo the treatment.

I’m sorry, but did you just hate fuck a film?

I mean you aren’t wrong. But you better bet they would find the limits and slide right up to them. For instance, practicing without a license: “OH we never claimed we were medical staff” etc. Or “OH we can’t claim were a clinic now we are a center”. It would be at best a very slow whackamole game, being that even Dem…

she had the option to “reverse” the abortion through a special pill

And who is going to make that illegal? The right wingers controlling state and federal legislatures? You’re right, but sadly unless you live in a few select states, there is no possible way to enact it.

The current state of the case law is that fake health providers can’t be legally required to tell the truth (about abortion in particular), but real health providers can be legally required to lie (again, about abortion in particular). It’s all sorts of wrong.

The ones claiming to be the most righteous are often the ones most wicked.

It really seems like there should be something illegal about pretending to be a medical clinic and lying about healthcare. I realize that these are just zealots cosplaying as medical professionals, but there are people who take them seriously as sources of information.