Of course he wanted a larger screen for his stubby fingers.

I swear if one admin official uses the term “intentioning” I’m going to fucking lose it.

Not punk, but still great. I saw them live and they were amazing. 

Oh yeah, he uses that one for everything regardless of context. It’s not a “smart” word like “tremendous”, though.

It’s going to own so hard if what brings him down is his inability to let any grudges with democrats go, such that he is asking anyone and everyone for dirt on his “enemies”. 

“Platonic ideal of a phone call” is so very good. Thanks for that chuckle.

Also, “tremendous”. However, he saves that one for when he wants to appear intelligent (3 syllables).

I’m aware of that. I’m just highlighting the sheer absurdity of their argument. Usually conspiracy theories have a coherent narrative, even if they start with false premises and arrive at faulty deductions.

I’m just trying to express the sheer absurdity of their current narrative - a true rhetorical clusterfuck.

What do the waving papers have to say?

Waving random papers around is about the weirdest appeal to authority I’ve seen in a long while.

I want my alloys.

Oh, everyone who questions tinpot dictator is a big meanie.

Let me get this conspiracy theory straight. Are they saying that HillaryObama got the Ukraine to hack the DNC so trump could win, but made it look like the Russians did it for trump so that a couple years into his presidency he would look like an idiot or something? All this nonsense is confusing as hell.

“Lawful Evil” as compared to “Chaotic... Whatever”.

Good points. I suppose if I were allowed full license to write the headline, it would end up sounding super-cynical. Like: “Yet Another Pederast Priest is Simply Put on Leave Rather Than Excommunicated and Jailed”.

I Feel Sick is also great.

That puts the focus on the leave, rather than the sexual abuse, which is what ThirdAmendmentMan’s objection was.

Oh, that’s better than mine (which was phrased a bit awkwardly).

That’s very interesting. I try not to make assumptions either way when it comes to paranormal phenomena. I have a scientific background and am generally a healthy degree of skeptic, but I don’t discount these sorts of things out of hand like many self-described “rational” folks do (usually hardcore atheists).