The simple reason is GM makes more money on the Sierra than the Chevy. As long as that stays true there's no way they will kill it, it costs them almost nothing to make 2 versions of the same truck.

3-series GT. It needs to die and it hasn't even started selling yet. Because of this we can't get a reasonable 3-series wagon (4-cyl, AWD, auto is only trim, and it's absurdly overpriced).

I am not driving, I am SAILING.

DC. Take a city that is full of lawyers, foreigners, and politicians, height restrict the buildings so it is a giant messy sprawl of roadways, add some flurries and you get a nightmare. Even worse because they actually regularly get snow but they still don't know how to handle it. One flake and everything shuts down.

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for explaining. So they're essentially paying ~$10-11B, but not technically as it's not actually all cash.

Including earlier purchases of holdings from the U.S. and Canadian governments, Fiat's spending on Chrysler stakes will total $3.7 billion. That compares with the $36 billion that the then Daimler-Benz AG paid for the U.S. company in 1998.

2-series

They already have a name for the SUV with RWD, it's called sDrive. I kid you not. Meet the X1 sDrive28i:

I just started DDing a 2013 Grand Cherokee a few weeks ago and I have to say it's a pretty nice vehicle. Not exactly my cup of tea (I prefer cars, and smaller ones at that) but if you're going to get an SUV/CUV, I'd say that's the most well rounded one out there.

If they ever make it, the inevitable Turbo S version of this

Jeep does this same thing. My friend got a company car, but the nav would put it over his limit. So he got the car without it, then got a quote for the dealer to activate the nav system since the hardware is already all there. No discount though, full option price (i think it's $750).

It's probably anodized, possibly with clear coat on top of that. Or at least it should be for $2.8 million

Gut reaction. Just posting because it's a lot more common than most of the suggestions here.

Apparently, Audi's version works brilliantly in Oregon, but I don't miss it for a second.

Mine as well. We passed one in the parking lot the other day and she said she really liked it and might buy one. I was dumbfounded. If she's dating me and finds that thing attractive...I may not be as good looking as I thought.

To be fair, this will probably never be built outside of a prototype or two. Boston Dynamic creates a lot of crazy stuff for government projects, most of which never gets built (think of DARPA programs).

Saying you're a Cowboys fan is like saying you have a disease. Every time I do you get that same look like "Oh, I was ready to like you, but nevermind. Go die in a fire." I have to explain every time the reason why, like I was explaining how I got AIDS.

I see a V-sport as being something conceptually similar to the Audi "S" models. Not quite a full on performance car, but something with more power and bit better handling for minimal ride trade-off. In that vein a Escalade V-sport makes much more sense. It should be something with a big V-8, lowered suspension, big…

Well it's as much based on the golf as the Juke R is based on a normal Juke