twerqy
twerqy
twerqy

Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy IV/VI/VII, Resident Evil 1/4, Crash Bandicoot

Definitely.

I know. The world would be a much better place if everyone ignored everyone else all the time.

I agree. And while we're at it, all movies should be shot multiple times so that every possible gender/race/sexual orientation/body type/disability is represented. And every book should be re-written from multiple perspectives. Michelangelo's David? He should have created versions for different races and genders as

"We're going to spend $200 million creating a movie called Avatar, but we aren't going to shoot a separate movie to accommodate people whining that the main character wasn't a woman."

You sound like someone who has never experienced the voice acting in Tales of Xillia.

He should be cut from the team. How do you become the quarterback and not know how the clock works?

Humans have been genetically modifying crops through selective breeding for millennia. Literally. Thousands of years. But now that we have a fancy new tools through which to do it? WITCHCRAFT!

Humans average growth declined when agriculture was introduced.

This is the type of person that gets offended when there's not a minority version of Tony the Tiger on frosted flakes.

I completely agree. I often look at Michelangelo's David and wonder...could he have not made a fat or female option as well? What was wrong with him?

GTA didn't start as something tongue-in-cheek. The original one was just about tracking down people and killing them, which is why it became so infamous, hated by the media, and banned in some instances. This helped it become popular and helped develop it into the massively successful series it is.

There's some people on Twitter claiming that there's a plant that cures ebola, but that posting about it anywhere (except for Twitter, which is where they were talking about it) gets your post deleted and account locked. Because pharmaceutical companies or something.

As someone who's never played a Borderlands game before, would this be a bad one to start with? Or would I be better off saving some money and buying the first one?

I play AGAINST bots more often than not and those games almost always have at least one fake player.

It's kind of ironic, if you actually go onto Twitter or somewhere and look up #Gamergate the only threats you see are against pro-Gamergate people.

Kotaku doesn't have any reason to provide an unbiased view on this. It hurts their narrative if they talk about made-up threats or threats against pro-Gamergate people.

...no mention of harassment, threats, and doxxing that pro-Gamergate individuals have been victims of? Weird how the people upset about threats against Zoe Quinn are complicit with threats against others. They deserve death threats because their beliefs, right?

If the threats and harassment are the primary issue, why not mention the threats and the harassment going the other way as well? There have been several articles about Gamergate on Gawker Media sites. If harassment is overwhelmingly the primary issue here, would it not be worth mentioning the threats, harassment, and

This is the most thoughtful reply I've received so far. But it was too long. 9/10.