Pretty much. I'm not sure how you would make pictures available to the public then control what people do with those pictures. I'm sure someone's masturbated to President Obama's official pictures. As long as there's no harassment happening or private information being posted, what is there to do?

I'm really not sure how you managed to extrapolate all of that out of what I posted, but bravo.

I'd agree with that.

This is what happens in 2014 though. Gawker does it all the time. When there is a notable news story, Google the name, look for a Facebook, now you have an image to go with your story. If you make it into the news, your profile picture is going out for the world to see.

I'm sure consenting to being photographed was part of the sign up process, especially for something as big as the Olympics. I've had to sign consents for that kind of thing before at events that weren't a fraction as big.

Does the AP/Getty/whoever typically censor things like that? (honest question)

People who wish to remain anonymous don't make their Facebook pictures viewable to the general public.

Unless I'm missing something here, the "gallery" is made up of pictures made publicly available by the AP or by the woman herself. These aren't paparazzi shots or hacked phone pictures, just the pictures that come up when you type her name into Google.

True. They've leapt across the creepy line and are toeing the inappropriate line, but it sounds like everything they've posted is publicly available already.

Creepy? Sure. But is it any worse than putting together a gallery of, say, Scarlett Johansson pictures?

I bought a 2012 Mazda3 over a Focus. Mazda3 had better ergonomics (B-pillar placement, mostly), better "infotainment" (no touch screen), and the automatic transmission was less bad in the Mazda3.

Poor decision making and lack of spatial awareness while driving. It's the same reason people will sit at a 4-way stop and wait until the previous car is completely out of the intersection before starting to go.

Did they remove all of the "you know?"s from the game? After my first play through I'd just play with the sound off because every other sentence ends with "you know."

Bald Bryan on the Adam Carolla show said that he coached at the high school Martin went to (within a few years of Martin being there, but not while he was there) and the word he used to describe the kids there? Pussies.

I'll try a gun analogy: The iPhone is a semiautomatic rifle, the iPod Touch is a bolt action hunting rifle. If your kid wanted a gun, but you didn't want them going on a rampage, would you get them the bolt action rifle and say, "WELP, PROBLEM SOLVED"?

Kids with smartphones and good data plans set up hotspots for the kids with iPod Touches or limited data plans. Plus there are unrestricted or public wifi networks everywhere.

You might want to let them know that an iPod Touch is basically an iPhone without a dedicated phone number. What's stopping her from using public or open wifi networks, or using a friend's smartphone as a hotspot?

I'm wondering who actually wrote the book and how much they're being paid to keep quiet.

Back in the day, there would be some kids on the mic in PC games (Counter Strike 10+ years ago), but not many. I think the young generations stick to the Xbox/Playstation these days or are at least smart enough to wait until their 16th birthday to start using a microphone.

I really don't think they know who they are. They can't. There's no way.