turnusvenus
TurnusVenus
turnusvenus

You failed to mention the appointment of conservative NLRB board members. That’ll make things more anti-union more immediatley than anything else.

“a kickoff punt” ?

Maybe you should update the article to show that she admitted to police that she made it up.

She admitted to police that she made it up, so I think we don’t have to guess what the truth is in this case.

In the article linked in that comment, it says she admitted to police that she made it up.

According to the news article, she admitted to police she made it up.

Thank you for this.

Holy shit, how many different offensive coordinators has Bradford had now? Poor guy has to be averaging more than one per year at this point.

This shit is not going to stop November 9th. Best case scenario will have Trump contesting the results of the election and Republicans doing their level best to impeach Hillary.

That’s not how it works though. If the evidence is inadmissible, it can’t come in through witnesses’ testimony either.

Subjecting people to ideological purity tests (like this article does) is what’s suspect. You act as if the only possible way someone could not agree with Kaepernick’s protest is if they are a full-fledged bigot.

Her friendship with Scalia reflects a trait that’s now viewed as a weakness, but is actually more or less

Looks like you are right.

Yeah, I was wondering if they showed them literally murdering babies in their cribs and made it clear he thought he was literally communicating with God. Sounds like they made him more conventional and took away some shades of gray.

I agree, which is why I don’t get the outrage over this.

I’d be curious to hear you explain how.

I think they would say not taking it seriously looks a lot like throwing your hands up and saying, “Welp, nothing you can do about random events!” and ignoring the politically inconvenient fact that a disproportionate number of these “random events” are perpetrated by radical muslims. I agree they haven’t offered any

Cops don’t aim for vitals. They aim for center mass. The terror suspect just got lucky. These two situations have nothing in common.

The problem is that the leniency granted to privileged perpetrators is generally based on things that I think should be considered when delivering a sentence.

For instance, I think a judge should take into account things like a person’s prior criminal history, whether they show remorse, and whether jail is actually

Thank you for pointing this out. People don’t appreciate the value of judicial independence. We don’t want judges fearful of public opinion when making a decision. We want them to evaluate the facts and the law as it applies to the case before them. People don’t like the result here, but Persky was not acting outside