truthhurts14
truthhurts14
truthhurts14

Let me translate for you. "Ed Sheeran didn't like something I said/did [note: for totally b.s. reasons] and it made me feel bad. Terry Richardson gave me nothing but praise [note: because he's a predatory pervert] and it made me feel good!"

I sincerely doubt either stance has much to do with her beliefs about

No, Ed's an asshole for saying "But what about the children?" when the issue is really his own hangups.

"When I first heard 'Wrecking Ball,' I thought it was a brilliant song. But the video distracts too much from it."

They should not be doing this, but when it comes to reasons for hating the police, this offense is gonna have to get at the end of a very long line.

Thanks. But I'm just one of dozens more. I wish people would realize that their words may mean something very different to young women then they intend sometimes. Administrators have to realize that they service diverse communities of students -many who may have a hell of a lot else going on.

It's the same thing I

Every morning from now on at my house:

I'm with SDZ. This sentence sounds like it is applying to Malik Gil: "This is just a continuation of the bullshit narrative that sexual assault victims are somehow to blame for being sexually assaulted."

I learned from a 45-year-old country song exactly why God made girls: to tell off the shaming bigots of the Harper Valley PTA.

Nicki is better than her ass. This song is shit. Her ass is fun to watch but I am cringing all the way through it. And anyone can have a fat, round ass if they pay for it so I'm not getting it. Troll away stans...I ain't listening.

The video is fun, but the best parts of the song are the Sir Mixalot parts. I actually like that fucking Taylor Swift thing from yesterday better.

They are, I can not lie. All you other viewers can't deny...

The same thing the NFL uses..Gatorade

Bump.

Beyond that, sone people really don't want their kids to know how bad it is. Some parents do not let their kids in on their financial situation because they don't want their children to feel burdened, less than, disadvantaged, or get bullied. Lots of people fake a better financial situation for their kids' benefit.

Look yo, like this movie or hate this movie, whatever. But can we please stop acting like having money makes you immune to boredom or loneliness or any other type of problems? It's not true, and it's harmful.

I'm not sure the cover of a men's magazine is the place where I think my future hypothetical kids will get healthy attitudes about sex. There is an anti-sex objection to these covers, but that doesn't mean that all sexually suggestive material is liberating or healthy.

I think the point that sending a *mens* magazine with the Lands End catalog is a good point - when I think of Lands End's target audience, young men don't come to mind. And while middle-aged men might wear LE clothes, I'll bet you dollars to donuts that it's their wives buying those polo shirts.

I like porn as much as the next girl, and that cover is clearly not it. But even I have to concede that that cover is probably a little inappropriate for general catalog customers. I mean, I think most of us here are pretty easy-going about nudity and general lasciviousness, but we do have to acknowledge that a lot of

Cobranding fail. Stories like these make me wonder what some people in market departments really do...